Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

New York’s attorney general begins probe of ISP broadband speeds

Add as a preferred source on Google

Broadband speeds are a touchy subject for Internet users around the world. It’s easy to think that your service isn’t quite as good as the price you’re paying would suggest it should be — and now New York’s attorney general looks set to begin a investigation to see if anything is amiss on an industry level.

Cablevision, Verizon and Time Warner were contacted by the attorney general’s office on Friday, and informed of concerns that consumers aren’t receiving advertised broadband speeds. The issue of higher priced packages not delivering proportionally better service was also raised, according to a report from the The Wall Street Journal.

Recommended Videos

“It turns out, many of us may be paying for one thing, and getting another,” said Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman in a statement released by his office. The three companies being scrutinized have each asserted that their services are properly priced, and each will co-operate with the investigation.

The inquiry will be led by Tim Wu, the lawyer and professor known for coining the term “net neutrality.” Wu was appointed as a special adviser to the attorney general’s office last month, with technological matters such as this one falling squarely into his wheelhouse.

To begin with, the investigation will focus on a large quantity of documents requested from the three companies being inspected. These papers include copies of all customer complaints relating to advertised broadband speeds not being delivered, as well as details of any “interconnection” deals between the companies and third parties.

It’s too early to say what the findings of this investigation will be, but hopefully it will prove to be a step toward fair broadband pricing for all. The Internet is only set to become a more essential service for households in the United States and further afield, so it’s crucial that the proper work is done to ensure its being provided properly.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces
Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software
Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.

Read more
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more