Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook removes baby-dunking video after criticism

Add as a preferred source on Google

Facebook has finally addressed critics after coming under fire for its slow response to a controversial video being called an example of child abuse. The video at issue shows a baby held by its limbs and being dunked into a bucket of water, as a woman keeps swinging it around. The baby’s then held upside down and then finally shaken. After this, the baby immediately falls silent, which is in stark contrast to its continuous screaming during the ordeal.

When initially confronted about the presence of this video on Facebook, the company defended it and termed it “baby yoga,” according to the Guardian.

Recommended Videos

Facebook, however, reversed itself completely. After different child abuse charities and child welfare organizations complained to the company, Facebook has begun scrubbing its site of the controversial video – with a caveat. It’s only removing these baby-dunking videos where users are actively encouraging this activity, but it’s allowing the videos to remain on posts that are condemning its use. Videos that condemn this behavior are marked with a “disturbing” label as well. We were able to find the video still posted by one user, but Facebook pulled it the next day.

The video is believed to have originated in Indonesia, and more information about its origins will come to light as Toronto police start an investigation to determine the baby’s location and where the video was shot, according to CTV News.

While this situation has been a public relations predicament for Facebook, it is not the first time that the company has been in the spotlight for allowing questionable videos to be posted on the site.

Back in 2013, the company initially let a beheading video stay up. However, after a campaign led by Prime Minister David Cameron of the United Kingdom, Facebook removed the graphic video and reconsidered its policy on allowing violent videos to stay up on the site.

Judging what videos are deemed acceptable or offensive can sometimes be a gray area, as Facebook’s struggles over the years have demonstrated. That’s why it’s a smart idea for users to exercise some discretion when posting videos to the social media site.

Marc Schenker
Marc Schenker is a copywriter who's an expert in business and marketing topics like e-commerce, B2Bs, digital marketing and…
WhatsApp pausing usernames for hundreds of millions of users over fraud fears
WhatsApp’s phone-number privacy feature runs into scrutiny in India
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

WhatsApp’s plan to let people use usernames instead of phone numbers has run into trouble in India, its biggest market. This newly introduced feature is meant to improve privacy by letting users connect without immediately sharing their phone number. Indian authorities, however, are worried that the same feature could make scams and impersonation harder to control.

India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has asked WhatsApp to pause the username rollout until consultations with the government are complete. That is a major intervention, since WhatsApp has more than 500 million users in the country, who rely on the app for their everyday personal and professional communications.

Read more
X wants you to go live with its new streaming hub, and is offering $1 million to make it worth your while
Live Studio brings scheduling, audience controls, and real-time analytics to X's Creator Studio, but the platform hasn't said how it plans to split the $1 million among creators.
X Live Studio screengrab

X is making a serious push to become a destination for live video, launching a new tool called Live Studio and pledging $1 million in creator payouts to attract streamers to the platform. Nikita Bier, X's head of product, announced the tool on X with a demo showcasing how it works.

Stream controls, real-time analytics, and a $1 million payout

Read more
Reddit is ending anonymous browsing on old Reddit, and longtime users are not happy
Reddit's old interface is getting a login requirement, and its long term future looks uncertain.
Reddit

If you have been quietly browsing old.reddit.com without logging in, that option is going away. Reddit just announced it will require everyone to log in to use old.reddit.com, with the change landing sometime over the next month. A Reddit admin broke the news on the platform, calling it part of a push to tighten how automated systems get into the site.

Why is Reddit locking down the old interface?

Read more