Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. Mobile
  5. Legacy Archives

eMusic Inks Deal with Warner Music Group

Add as a preferred source on Google
Toni Braxton
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Online music service eMusic and Warner Music Group have announced an agreement that will see eMusic start selling tracks from WMG artists. The deal is eMusic’s second with a major label—it signed a distribution agreement with Sony Music last year—and will include artists from Warner labels like Atlantic and Rhino, as well as independents distributed through Warner’s ADA project.

“Our editors look forward to contextualizing WMG’s catalogue with the unique eMusic sensibility our members have come to expect,” said eMusic president and CEO Danny Stein, in a statement. “We’re excited to work with Warner Music Group’s labels, and by focusing on their hidden gems as well as classic albums, help them increase sales across their entire catalog.”

Recommended Videos

eMusic made a name for itself by insisting on selling tracks in DRM-free MP3 format while the rest of the industry was busy shooting itself in the foot by insisting digital music only be sold with DRM protection. As a result, eMusic had a tough time signing artists from major labels and focussed instead on music from independent labels, world music, and other specialized areas. The result isn’t the largest catalog of tracks on the planet, but the quality and diversity of eMusic’s offerings was unmatched my major online music stores.

eMusic hasn’t announced any changes to its price structure, but the company did rankle fans in 2009 when it signed its deal with Sony: the arrangement lets eMusic offer catalog tracks that are over two years old, but eMusic simultaneously raised its subscription prices.

Industry watchers have eMusic looking to set up a streaming music service for subscribers sometime in 2010.

[Image: Tony Braxton, WMG publicity shot.]

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more