Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Intuit Pays a Mint for Mint.com

Add as a preferred source on Google

mint-comFinancial software giant Intuit—makers of well-known products like Quicken, QuickBooks, and TurboTax—has announced a deal to acquire personal finance services Web site Mint.com for some $170 million in cash. Mint.com is a financial services Web site designed to show consumers ways in which they can save money by analyzing their financial actions and habits. The service claims some 1.5 million users tracking nearly $50 billion in assets and $200 billion in transactions. Intuit plans to make Mint.com the main personal finance management service it offers to consumers via the Web, while Intuit’s existing Quicken Online will continue to offer Quicken users online access to their Quicken services.

“Joining Intuit enables us to bring our vision of helping consumers understand and do more with their money to millions of Intuit customers,” said Mint.com Founder and CEO Aaron Patzer, in a statement. “This is a compelling combination of our innovative product, technology, and user interface design with one of the most trusted brands in software.”

Recommended Videos

Intuit is also excited about Mint.com’s “ways to save” engine, which generates revenue through advertising and partnerships rather than charging users directly. Intuit also sees the acquisition as a way to bolster its Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offerings—SaaS isn’t uncommon in corporate and enterprise environments, but has had difficulty finding traction with consumers—although Google, Microsoft, and many other software developers are increasingly eyeing cloud-based computing and SaaS models as a way to offer software, rather than monolithic releases.

Mint’s Aaron Patzer will become the general manager of Intuit’s Personal Finance group, and will be responsible for Intuit’s online, mobile, and desktop personal finance products.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more