Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Intel unveils cheaper models of its Ivy Bridge processors

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Intel announced the launch of several new inexpensive processors using the company’s Ivy Bridge architecture. According to Slashgear, the new products include three Celeron CPUs, four Pentiums, and a new Core i3-3210. All of them are available starting now at a price range of $42 to $117.  

To get technical for a minute, the new Celerons have 2MB of L3 cache, HD integrated graphics, and between 2.3GHz and 2.7GHz. All four Pentiums have 3MB of L3 cache, HD integrated graphics, and range from 2.5GHz to 3.2GHz. Finally, the Core i3-3210 features HD 2500 graphics and 3.2GHz. All of the new models are compatible with Intel’s Socket 1155, so you won’t need to make any motherboard upgrades in order to install one of these low-cost processors. The Celeron and Pentium versions do not have hyper-threading, Intel’s framework that helps in tackling multiple tasks at once, so for the best performance for your buck, it’s worth checking out the Core i3. 

Recommended Videos

Ivy Bridge first appeared on the scene early last summer and has since been one of the preferred choices for powering up top-shelf computers. Intel didn’t change the architecture of its predecessor, but offers better efficiency by making the entire chip smaller. Last year, Intel was rumored to be pushing for another improvement in efficiency in order to get Ivy Bridge into contention for use in tablets, an area in which power is usually sacrificed in favor of battery life.

Intel is making the whole suite of new chips available immediately, so they should be appearing soon on retailers’ websites. It’s a great option for the do-it-yourself crew working on a budget. Even if Ivy Bridge falls from its top position, the architecture will give you solid performance at a good price. 

Image via Sh4rp_i

Anna Washenko
Former Contributor
Anna is a professional writer living in Chicago. She covers everything from social media to digital entertainment, from tech…
Google Chrome can now find what you need in Gmail before you even ask
Soon digging through your Gmail will be a thing of the past.
Google Chrome

Google Chrome's autofill has always been pretty handy for filling in addresses, passwords, and payment information. Now, the feature could be getting ever better thanks to better integration with Gmail. The company will soon allow the browser to dig through your Gmail inbox and pull out information you would otherwise spend several minutes hunting for.

According to Google's official announcement, Chrome's enhanced autofill can now use Gemini with Personal Intelligence to retrieve order numbers, package tracking details, and flight booking information directly from Gmail.

Read more
The new MacBook Pro has a stabilized camera and it’s a practical perk hiding in plain sight
Apple's touchscreen MacBook Pro promises steadier video calls when fingers hit the display, with a redesigned hinge helping reduce screen wobble
MacBook Pro Stabilization

The new MacBook Pro has a camera upgrade worth a closer look amid the touchscreen and OLED excitement. Apple says its advanced video stabilization keeps the camera feed steady when you touch the display, so tapping through a document during a call shouldn't send a tremor through everyone else's screen.

A touchscreen invites people to prod the lid while its camera is pointed at their face. Accounting for what the person watching sees is a sensible detail to build around that change.

Read more
I found a smart reason to buy Apple’s touchscreen MacBook, and it’s Xcode
Apple's $2,899 MacBook Pro might be a developer's dream
Apple-MacBook-Pro-with-PROLED-XDR-Display-lifestyle

Apple has just introduced a new touchscreen MacBook Pro, and the moment I saw the press material, I was intrigued owing to one crucial upgrade – support for touch input on its OLED screen. Apple's response to people asking for a touchscreen-enabled MacBook used to be that macOS was never built to support a touch interface. There is plenty of hot chatter going on about the"need for a touchscreen on a MacBook" in the first place, and given Apple's historical dismissal of a touch-sensitive display on Macs, it's somewhat justified.

I've used plenty of touchscreen Windows laptops over the years, but I didn't expect to pay nearly $3,000 for Apple's own take on such a notebook. But as someone who just got into the world of app development, I can see a genuinely compelling reason for the upgrade. Or maybe, it's just me trying to convince myself that there's a genuinely practical benefit to spending nearly three thousand dollars on a new laptop, ditching one that is already working fine for me.

Read more