Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

P2P Still Rules the Download Scene

Add as a preferred source on Google

It could all come down to the Supreme Court ruling in the MGM vs. Grokster case that determines whether digital downloads will cease to exist or not. According to NPD, P2P (peer-to-peer) downloads are still ruling the net despite increased interest by users in the pay-to download market. To give you an idea of just how skewed the landscape really is, in March of 2005 243 million songs were downloaded from P2P services compared to only 26 million songs that were actually purchased online. But things could be changing.

NPD estimates that the pay-per-download market could see a potential for 30 million consumers due to better technology in broadband and MP3 players. Forty-one percent of digital music consumers say they began to download because of faster Internet access, 30 percent said it was because they had purchased a better computer and 22 percent attributed their digital music consumption to the fact that they had recently purchased a digital/MP3 player. Promotions were also important to consumers: 34 percent reported that they first downloaded music legally because of a special offer.

Recommended Videos

At the same time, consumers are somewhat confused by perceived restrictions on what they can do with the music they purchase and download. They are also concerned by the price of the services. As a result only 55 percent of consumers who tried legal services came back for more in subsequent months. By comparison, 85 percent of peer-to-peer (P2P) users engaged in repeat usage in 2004.

This should come as no surprise, with current DRM (Digital Rights Management) laws and regulations in place, most consumers have a hard time understanding the limitations to the music they just downloaded. Download a song via Apple iTunes and want to play it on your Creative Micro Zen? Fat chance, it just won’t work.

P2P Comparison Table
Ian Bell
I'm the co-founder and CEO of Digital Trends Media Group, which I launched in 2006 out of my home office to share my passion…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more