Lego Goes Open Source

By Geoff Duncan Published May 1, 2006

Lego Goes Open Source — Image used with permission by copyright holder

If you think the toys you built with ordinary Legos were cool, robotics enthusiasts are about to make a quantum leap forward. The Lego Group announced today that it plans to release the firmware of its Lego Mindstorms microprocessor (the new NXT brick) as open source in August 2006. In addition, the company will release Software, Hardware, and Bluetooth software development kits (SDKs).

These tools should enable robotics enthusiasts and third parties to develop new sensors and controllers, and create Bluetooth applications which can remotely control their robotic creations. Although the Mindstorms NXT is exciting geeks everywhere, it really is intended for anyone from the age of ten and up: when it ships in August, the NXT will ship with 571 pieces, the NXT “brain” brick, three servo motors, a variety of sensors (which respond to touch, light, ultrasonics, and sound), USB 2.0 and Bluetooth connectivity, and a LabVIEW powered programming environment which runs on PCs and Macs. MindStorms NXT will carry a suggested retail price of $249.99.

Recommended Videos

Lego has been involving its fan community in the development of MindStorm NXT to integrate the features and capabilities enthusiasts want. “Most often, innovation comes from the core community of users,” said Soren Lund, director of Lego MindStorms. “When we launched the legacy MindStorms platform in 1998, the community found ways to do these things on their own, and we were faced with the question of whether to allow it, which we decided to embrace and encourage. Now, given the strong user base and versatility and power of the NXT platform, the right to hack is a ‘no brainer.’ We’re excited to see how our open approach will push new boundaries of robotic development and are eager for all enthusiasts to share their creations with the community.”

Personally, I’d love to design a stair-climbing robot specifically to drive the cats insane.

Former Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces

Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software

Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.

Computing

Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks

The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping

Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Computing

You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it

A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic

AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.