Earlier this week, a Dutch court ruled that the bans on Pirate Bay, the ultra popular torrent site, that were forced on two ISPs based in the Netherlands, were illegal, and therefore lifted them. While the removal of the bans applies directly the Pirate Bay’s site and user access to it within that nation’s borders, a ban is still in effect for a Pirate Bay proxy site that surged in popularity once the bans were put in place. The proxy site was eventually ordered to be taken down too, though.
However, with this week’s ruling, the legitimacy of the forced shutdown of the Pirate Bay proxy site is now being called into question.
Initially, BREIN, an anti-piracy outfit, fought to and successfully had a Dutch court order two ISPs, Ziggo and XS4ALL to block subscriber access to Pirate Bay. After the ban was put in place, many of those people began to use a Pirate Bay proxy site as a workaround. BREIN got wise to the loophole, and fought in court to have that site taken down, which it successfully did.
Now though, the Dutch Pirate Party, which operated the proxy site until it was ordered to be shut down, is making efforts to reactivate it in light of this week’s ruling.
Here’s what Mark Krul, an attorney who has represented the Dutch Pirate Party in its legal battles against BREIN, had this to say when speaking with TorrentFreak.
“Now that the Court of Appeal has decided that the providers Ziggo and XS4ALL cannot be forced to block The Pirate Bay, this means that The Pirate Bay can be visited again by the Dutch public.”
“In this respect, there is no need for the Dutch public to use any proxy. But, since there are blockades of The Pirate Bay worldwide, there is still a need for proxies to ensure that internet users in other parts of the world have the freedom to decide whether they want to use a website such as The Pirate Bay or any other website.”
Krul went on to say that a Dutch court order stating that the proxy site is infringing on the rights of the entertainment industry “must be destroyed by the Court of Appeal,” and that proceedings should conclude “by the end of this year.”
What do you think? Sound off in the comments below.
