Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Microsoft Agrees to 18 Months More Antitrust Oversight

Add as a preferred source on Google
Microsoft Agrees to 18 Months More Antitrust Oversight
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The United States government’s antitrust oversight of software giant Microsoft was supposed to have ended way back in 2007, with Microsoft completing required technical documentation on its technologies and protocols so third parties could develop products that successfully interoperated with Microsoft’s operating systems and services. However, has of mid-2006 the documentation was far from complete, so the Department of Justice and Microsoft agreed to a two-year extension that pushed the oversight of Microsoft’s antitrust compliance all the way out to November 2009. And now? Those two years weren’t enough, and—despite a new commitment interoperability— Microsoft still isn’t done with that documentation. The result? Microsoft and the DOJ have filed for another 18 month extension of Microsoft’s antitrust oversight.

If approved by Judge Kollar-Kotelly, the extension would see oversight of Microsoft’s compliance with antirust rulings stretched out through May 12, 2011. The original antitrust settlement with Microsoft was reached in November 2002.

Recommended Videos

Although Microsoft’s forthcoming Windows 7 operating system is mentioned in the filing, it does not appear to be a primary reason for the oversight extension; instead, the delay seems to be to accommodate a technical review process of the materials Microsoft has produced, which apparently still feature many unresolved issues.

A hearing on the extension has been scheduled for April 22.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more