Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Apple Ramping Up to Design Its Own Chips?

Add as a preferred source on Google
Apple Ramping Up to Design Its Own Chips?
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Technology darling Apple looks to be assembling a team of seasons industry veterans to design its own chips, potentially in a move to keep its products differentiated from the rest of the consumer electronics market…and help the famously secretive company keep its product plans under wraps. About a year ago, Apple acquired low-power microchip developer P.A. Semi, and recently engaged in a battle with IBM over hiring Mark Papermaster as the new senior VP for Devices Hardware Engineering—meaning he’s overseeing iPod and iPhone engineering. Now, the Wall Street Journal and other outlets are reporting that Apple has hired former AMD graphics CTOs Raja Moduri and Bob Drebin.

If Apple is building its own in-house chip design team, it runs counter to the broader industry trend to use off-the-shelf components and outsource chip development to fabless engineering outfits. However, by keeping its chip design in-house, Apple would be able to keep its cards closer to its chest, disclosing less information about its forthcoming products to partners and suppliers…which, in turn, means less information about future Apple products can leak to the competitors or the press. Apple’s recent consumer electronics success has stemmed in part from being able to beat its competitors to market with new products and capabilities, then keep innovating ahead of the curve while competitors rush to emulate what Apple has already done.

Recommended Videos

An Apple spokesperson declined to comment on the reports.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more