Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

FTC Settles with Scareware Perpetrators

Add as a preferred source on Google
FTC Settles with Scareware Perpetrators
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In what might be described as an apparent slap on the wrist, the Federal Trade Commission has decided to settle with two defendants in a scareware scam for a mere $116,687, rather than continue to go after them for the full $1.9 million levied against the defendants in an earlier judgement. The reason? The defendants are unable to pay the full amount.

James Reno and ByteHosting Internet Service, LLC, were found to be part of a substantial deceptive online advertising scheme that tricked over a million computer users into buying bogus computer security product based on fake scans that claimed to detect viruses and other malware on consumers’ computers. The software would then ask for money to clean up the systems.

Recommended Videos

The original judgment against them was for $1.9 million in damages; however, based in inability to pay, the FTC has scaled back the fine to just over $116,000—the amount of money the defendants supposedly earned from the scam. If the defendants are found to be misrepresenting their financial condition, they will again be liable for the full amount.

The defendants are also barred from using “scareware” tactics in future business endeavors or installing malicious programs on users’ computers. We really hope that doesn’t mean it’s perfectly OK for anyone else to install malware or use scareware to promote their enterprises.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more