Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Intel, Motherboard Makers License Nvidia SLI

Add as a preferred source on Google
Intel, Motherboard Makers License Nvidia SLI
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Over the last few years, relations between chipmaker Intel and graphics developer Nvidia have been anything but peachy: the two companies have engaged in fairly public name-calling over Intel’s integrated graphics controllers and product bundling, countersuing each other over chipset licensing, and Nvidia has even been entering the high-performance supercomputer arena, where Intel really doesn’t want a tremendous amount of competition. However, occasionally, the companies can agree on something: Intel has licensed Nvidia’s SLI technology for supporting multiple graphics cards on “Nehalem” P55 chipset-based motherboards built around Intel’s Core i7 and Core i5 processors. Other major motherboard manufacturers Asus, EVGA, Gigabyte, and MSI are also on board. The result is that any consumer with a P55-based motherboard will be able to count on SLI support with any combination of up to three Nvidia GeForce graphics cards.

“Nvidia SLI technology is a perfect complement to the processing prowess of our new Core i7 and Intel DP55KG desktop board,” said VP and general manager of Intel’s client board division Clem Russo, in a statement. “Nvidia and Intel share a combined passion for furthering the PC as the definitive platform for gaming, and this combination will surely be attractive to anyone building or purchasing a brand new PC this fall.”

Recommended Videos

The licensing agreement does not resolve ongoing disputes between Nvidia and Intel, some of which center around memory controllers being integrated into forthcoming Intel processors. Nvidia argues that 2004 technology licenses it has with Intel apply to both separate memory controllers and to controllers rolled into CPUs; Intel argues the integrated memory controllers are a separate technology not covered under existing agreements.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more