Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

New $25 blood test can tell you every virus you’ve ever had

Add as a preferred source on Google

Ever wanted to look back on the history of your immune system, sort of like how you can look back on your browser history today? Well even if you’ve never had the desire to do such a thing, don’t worry — scientists have developed a way to make it happen.

Detailed in a new report in the journal Science, researchers have developed a new test that can determine every virus that has ever affected you — and all it takes is a single drop of blood. As you would expect, the process is fairly complex, but conceptually it’s fairly easy to understand. Here’s a very basic overview of how it works.

Recommended Videos

Whenever your body is infected with a virus, your immune system jumps into action, setting loose a team of special white blood cells called T and B lymphocytes. Some T cells are capable of detecting and killing viruses, but others serve as “helpers” for B cells, which then produce antibodies. Antibodies, as you might remember from high school biology class, are the little y-shaped proteins that tag invading cells for destruction.

After your body conquers the virus and clears it from your system, some of these specialist T and B cells stay around to keep a “memory” of the destroyed virus, so that your body can more easily identify it in the event that it should ever come back. The newly-developed technique basically teases out these memories, and uses them to determine all the viruses a person has ever been infected with.

While you might not care to know all the illnesses you’ve ever had, that kind of information is invaluable to virologists. Armed with this data, infectious disease researchers could do amazing things, like track patterns of disease across various populations, help scientists compare immune responses in old and young people, or see how the same virus affects people in different parts of the world. If performed on old blood samples (which labs often store from previous studies), the technique could even be used to help us learn about how viruses spread in the past.

The process is still in the experimental phase, but scientists are already highly optimistic about the potential impact it will have. “This will be a treasure trove for communicable disease epidemiology,” infectious disease expert Dr. William Schaffner of Vanderbilt University told the New York Times. “It will be like the introduction of the electron microscope. It will allow us to have more resolution at a micro level.”

It’s worth noting, however, that the test isn’t quite ready for primetime just yet. It’s still in the experiemental stages right now, and despite the fact that it’s already farily cheap to administer (about $25 per test), it’s far from perfect. The test still takes weeks to complete, and it can still miss some viruses, including past infections that the body’s immune system is only responding to on a very low level.

Even so, it’s still a very exciting development. With a few more trials and careful testing, the hope is to streamline the test and make it available to the general public. In a couple years, you might just be able to request your “virus history” at your next checkup.

Drew Prindle
Former Senior Editor, Features
Drew Prindle is an award-winning writer, editor, and storyteller who currently serves as Senior Features Editor for Digital…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more