Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

AI Mode in Google Search now lets you ask follow-ups from AI Overviews

Your overview can keep its context as you jump into a back-and-forth chat, so you spend less time re-explaining what you meant.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Google AI Mode for Search.
AI mode in Google Search. Google

Google is tightening the connection between AI Overviews and AI Mode in Google Search. Starting now, you can ask a follow-up right from an AI Overview and keep the same context as the conversation continues in AI Mode.

It’s a small change with a big payoff if you’ve ever hit the limit of a one-and-done summary. When a quick answer turns into a deeper question, the handoff is supposed to feel seamless, and Google says prominent links remain part of the experience so you can still click out to the web.

Follow-ups without the reset

Google says the new flow is designed to reduce repetition. You start with an Gemini 3-powered AI Overview, ask your next question on the results page, then continue in AI Mode without re-entering the basics that shaped the first answer.

Recommended Videos

In its testing, Google says people preferred results that can naturally shift into a conversation. The company is framing it as one continuous experience, with links staying visible so you can step past the summary when you want the original pages.

A nudge toward longer searches

Google is aiming at the gap between fast searches and real research. It says Search still needs to be great for quick hits like scores or weather, but it also wants to handle longer, more complex questions that don’t fit into a single response. One question becomes two. Then three.

In practice, the results page starts to behave more like a session. You get the snapshot, then push forward with follow-ups that stay anchored to the same premise instead of starting over every time your question evolves.

Mobile rollout, and what to watch

Google says the jump from AI Overviews into AI Mode is rolling out on mobile globally. That matters, phones are where retyping context feels most annoying, and where a smoother follow-up flow can save time.

For now, treat AI Overviews as a starting point, then move into AI Mode when you need more depth, and use the links when accuracy matters. Keep an eye on availability, Google doesn’t outline timing by country, language, or account type in this update, so the experience may show up gradually.

Paulo Vargas
Paulo Vargas is an English major turned reporter turned technical writer, with a career that has always circled back to…
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more
Google Earth’s AI misadventure lasted only a day. It was a tale of dangerous ignorance.
Nuclear reactors, tanks, and historical destruction on a life-like satellite map? Yeah, that's bad.
Nano Banana AI image generator representation.

Technology behemoths are clearly not reading the room, or they are just moving faster than they should when it comes to AI deployment. Google has already stuffed its Gemini AI in every corner of its software stack, from Android to daily productivity tools like Gmail that are used by hundreds of millions of users every day. AI is everywhere. Not all of it is bad, mind you. But in a few places, it just feels forced.

In its latest AI-fication experiment, the company targeted Google Earth. The idea was to let the audience use its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator and make images that can be placed on the map view. On paper, it's a cool idea. What would the Colosseum of Rome look like in your urban neighborhood? Yeah, fun stuff like that.

Read more