Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Antitrust Suit Says Google Fixes Ad Prices

Add as a preferred source on Google
Antitrust Suit Says Google Fixes Ad Prices
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s no denying that Google is the currently the 800-pound Gorilla of the Internet search and keyword advertising markets—the company handles about two-thirds of all Internet searches (more in some countries) and handles an even larger proportion of ad links that appear on millions of Web sites. Now TradeComet, which runs the tiny competing search engine SourceTool, as filed an antitrust complaint against Google, alleging the company manipulates the prices of its advertising to suppress competition from rival search tools. According to TradeComet, Ads it used to be able to buy for 5 to 10 center per click suddenly skyrocketed to $5 and $10 per click just as SourceTool was starting to gain some industry momentum.

SourceTool looks to help businesses looking to offer services or goods to one another, rather than acting as a search engine for consumers. According to TradeComet, traffic to SourceTool dropped by 90 percent after Google initiated its new pricing terms in May 2006—just after SourceTool was ranked as the second fastest-growing Web site by media metrics firm comScore.

Recommended Videos

Google has come under increased scrutiny for its dominant position in the online advertising market, and regulators’ concerns over its reach led to the termination of a planned advertising partnership with Yahoo last year.

Google has not commented on the TradeComet suit directly, but has always maintained that the online advertising market is highly competitive, with firms like AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo also running major advertising operations.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more