Back in 2009, online music market BlueBeat made headlines by offering Beatles songs for sale for prices as low as $0.25 a track—long before the Beatles finally succumbed to the lure of online music sales and let their music be sold via Apple’s iTunes. A court order (followed by an injunction) took Beatles music off BlueBeat in short order, but the record labels concerned over BlueBeat’s activities—EMI, Capital, and Virgin—didn’t stop there, and have just reached a $950,000 settlement with the company to settle copyright infringement claims.
To most people’s ears, BlueBeat was simply ripping tracks from Beatles and other artists and offering them for sale without authorization—or paying royalties to the artists, copyright holders, and/or publishers. BlueBeat, however, contended that it wasn’t selling the original recordings, but rather “psycho-acoustic simulations” of Beatles music—which were copyrighted by BlueBeat. That claim didn’t hold water with the court, which had no difficulty issuing a restraining order preventing BlueBeat from distributing the recordings.
Under the terms of the settlement (PDF), BlueBeat and parent company MRT will be paying $950,000 in a settlement, and agrees to stop distributing or linking to any copyrighted works controlled by the labels involved in the settlement—that covers not just Beatles material, but a broad range of other artists. BlueBeat may also be on the hook for other damages and attorneys’ fees.
Editors' Recommendations
- German court: Rat out your adult children’s illegal downloads, or pay the fine yourself
- Swedish anti-piracy law resulted in boost of music sales, drop in Internet traffic
- China to ‘punish’ Baidu, others for illegal music downloads
- MPAA sues DVD-streaming service Zediva
- Myspace up for sale as Myspace Music President Courtney Holt steps down
