Skip to main content

British high court rules Assange arrest warrant valid

Julian Assange, October 2011

After months of legal drama, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is much closer to being extradited to Sweden to face sex crime charges: Britain’s High Court has ruled that the Sweden arrest warrant for Assange was both issued and executed correctly. In a bid to avoid extradition, Assange’s lawyers had been arguing that the Swedish prosecutor seeking the extradition was not a “judicial authority” under the law, and therefore had no authority to issue a European arrest warrant. The High Court dismissed that argument, finding that the warrant was valid, while allowing European member states must exercise due “scrutiny” on surrender requests from other states.

Assange’s legal team did not have a response to the high court’s ruling, which seems to have come as a bit of a surprise to the court. According to media reports, Assange’s legal team had received a copy of the ruling late last week, and were widely expected to immediate file for permission to take the case to Britain’s supreme court. Assange’s team has up to 14 days to make such a filing, however.

Assange also argued that he has not been accused of any offense in Sweden. The Swedish arrest warrant merely allows Assange to be questioned over sex crime allegations. To date, Assange has not been charged with any crime in the case.

Julian Assange has been under effective house arrest since last December when he was granted bail on the condition he surrender his passport, report to police, comply with a curfew, and wear an electronic monitoring device. Assange has largely been staying in a 10-bedroom mansion of a supporter in a 600-acre estate northeast of London.

Allegations against Assange stem from two separate sexual encounters in Stockholm in August 2010; both women claim Assange refused requests to use a condom. One of the women accuses Assange of having sex with her while she was asleep, and one of the women says Assange pinned her down with his body weight during sex. Assange has argued the sex as consensual and that the allegations, even if true, would not constitute crimes under British law. However, Sweden’s sexual assault laws have a broader scope than Britain’s.

Wikileaks supporters have argued the charges are politically motivated, landing on the heels of Wikileaks disclosing hundreds of thousands of classified U.S. diplomatic cables, including many details that have proven embarrassing to U.S. and European leaders. Some have posited the extradition to Sweden is merely a pretext for moving Assange to the United States to face charges.

Wikileaks’ disclosure of classified documents has also led to U.S.-tied payment providers (such as MasterCard, Visa, PayPal, and Amazon) cutting off financial services for Wikileaks. Their actions prompted cyberattacks from Anonymous and other “hacktivist” groups, but the financial blockade seems to have been effective: Assange recently issued a plea for support, and Wikileaks has turned all its attention to raising money.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Judge says U.S. government can have Wikileaks Twitter info

U.S. federal district judge Theresa Buchanan has ruled the U.S. government can have access to Twitter account information of associates of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Buchanan finds that the account-holders do not have any legal standing to challege the government's order for account information, since the order only seeks information about the accounts, rather than the contents of messages.

The ruling is the latest development in a process that began last December when the U.S. government served Twitter with an order seeking information about accounts belonging to several individuals associated with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Targets of the government's investigation include Assange himself as well as Bradley Manning, who is suspected of leaking classified U.S. government information to Wikileaks. Other targets include U.S. representative Jacob Appelbaum, Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir, and Dutch activist Rop Gonggrijp.

Read more
WikiLeaks’ alleged source Bradley Manning could face death penalty
wikileaks mit students helped manning hack into government systems 001

The United States Army has filed 22 additional charges against suspected WikiLeaks whistle-blower Pfc. Bradley Manning, one of which could land him the death penalty, reports CBS News.

The new set of charges, say Army officials, come after a seven month military investigation, which has concluded that Manning, 23, illegally downloaded classified documents from government computers, and passed it off to "the enemy" — i.e. WikiLeaks. In doing so, Army investigators believe Manning "aided the enemy," an offense that could result in court-ordered execution.

Read more
Internet and WikiLeaks up for Nobel Peace Prize

It looks like it could be a winning year for the digital community. The Nobel Committee announced its nominees for the Nobel Peace Prize today, and among the 241 candidates were the Internet and WikiLeaks.

The uprisings in the Middle East would not have been without the Internet. After Tunisia successfully uprooted its dictator, demonstrations spread like wildfire thanks to viral videos and statements across Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. Connectivity proved to be the catalyst in the revolutions, and in many cases the only tool for activists desperate to tell the world what was and is happening.

Read more