Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Buffalo Gear Maker Pays Microsoft for Linux Patent Immunity

Add as a preferred source on Google
Buffalo Gear Maker Pays Microsoft for Linux Patent Immunity
Image used with permission by copyright holder

In another move that shows how Microsoft is working to turn the screws on the Linux community, the Melco Group—parent company of Buffalo Inc. and the Buffalo Group—has entered into a deal with Microsoft to get indemnity for itself and its customers from claims its network-attached storage devices and routers may infringe on Microsoft patents. Under the deal, Melco is paying Microsoft an undisclosed amount, and Microsoft agrees not to sue Melco or its customers for infringing on selected Microsoft patents.

Microsoft does not specify which patents are at issue, but the company has claimed for years that portions of the open source Linux operating system infringe on its patents; in recent months, Microsoft has been ratcheting up pressure on vendors, urging them to enter into indemnity agreements with Microsoft to protect them in the event Microsoft ever decides to pursue legal action against Linux, companies producing Linux-based products, or even companies using Linux.

Recommended Videos

“We are pleased to reach this agreement with Melco Group,” said Microsoft’s general manager of intellectual property and licensing David Kaefer, in a statement. “Many companies have entered similar agreements with Microsoft covering their Linux-based offerings, something that is a reflection of both Microsoft’s decades-long commitment to R&D in the operating system space and the high-quality patent portfolio we’ve developed through our R&D efforts.”

The Linux community has consistently asserted that its operating system does not violate any patents, and has publicly (and repeatedly) challenged Microsoft to identify which patents it believes Linux infringes upon. To date, Microsoft has not made any specific infringement claims.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more