Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Chrome OS Means Google CEO Reviewing Role on Apple Board

Add as a preferred source on Google
Chrome OS Means Google CEO Reviewing Role on Apple Board
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Speaking at the Allen & Company media and technology conference in Sun Valley, Idaho, this week, Google CEO Eric Schmidt indicated that Google’s newly-announced Chrome OS means that he will have to speak with Apple about how his role on the Apple Board of Directors might change. Google’s Chrome OS will presumably be in direct competition with Apple’s own Mac OS X operating system products. The position not only creates a potential conflict of interest, but federal law prohibits individuals from being on the boards of multiple companies if it decreases competition between them.

Prior to Google announcement of Google Chrome OS, the Federal Trade Commission was already looking into possible antitrust concerns with Schmidt’s role on the Apple board. Schmidt says he recuses himself from the Apple boardroom when talk turns to the iPhone—Google competes directly with Apple on the mobile phone front with its Android mobile operating system.

Recommended Videos

Schmidt says he will discuss the issue with Apple, but for the time being there is no change with regard to his role on Apple’s board.

Schmidt is not alone in holding positions at both companies; former Genentech chairman Arthur Levinson is a corporate director for Google and Apple.

Allen & Company widely regarded as a leading investment firm in the entertainment and media markets.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more