Skip to main content

Don’t think consoles have changed the requirements of PC games? Have a look for yourself

consoles have changed pc requirements assassins creed unity ww2 machinegun 1415412327
For better or worse, new cross-platform titles like Assassin's Creed: Unity put aging PC hardware to the test Image used with permission by copyright holder
The controversy surrounding my article about how consoles have increased system requirements in PC games exceeded anything I could have predicted. My claim was simple; if you have a system that’s getting on in years, such as one with a dual-core processor and/or a video card with 2GB of VRAM or less, some of the newest cross-platform games will challenge your rig. PC gamers are no longer guaranteed the flawless experience they’ve become accustomed to with previous cross-platform ports.

This assertion is indisputably supported by the facts. While I could write a separate benchmark post, there’s really no need, as other reputable sites have already tested these games more extensively than I could.

Sites that back up my claims include:

And so on.

Of these high-profile holiday blockbusters only Advanced Warfare runs alright on older systems, though it too chokes on mid-range mobile GPUs that are a couple generations old. The others demand recent hardware. Anandtech found that even the AMD Radeon R9 280 barely hits 30FPS at medium detail and 1080p resolution in Assassin’s Creed: Unity while Notebookcheck.net found Dragon Age: Inquisition won’t exceed 30FPS at 1080p and high detail on anything less than a GTX 770M paired with an Intel mobile quad.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The end of the last console generation created an environment where even low-end hardware could handle any port at 30FPS and 720p resolution (the maximum typical of the last-gen consoles). Playing at 1080p was usually no sweat, even at maximum or near-maximum detail. That era is over. Going forward, PC gamers will need more powerful hardware to obtain the performance they’re accustomed to seeing. This situation will likely continue for several years.

These findings are not the same as declaring PCs are less powerful or can’t handle games, a statement many commenters put in my mouth. It’s clear that a powerful computer is faster than any console. But, as highlighted by the Steam hardware survey, not everyone can afford a powerful computer. For those on a budget the change in typical system requirements is meaningful.

And this is not an unusual turn of events. The same trend occurred with the release of the Xbox 360/PS3. It’s more relevant now, though, because cross-platform releases have become the rule rather than an exception. While some might contend the change has nothing to do with consoles, that’s a hard claim to take seriously given the sudden leap has occurred just after the release of new console hardware, and the lack of any innovation on the PC side that would spur such advancement.

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Don’t believe the hype — the era of native resolution gaming isn’t over
Alan Wake looking at a projection of himself.

Native resolution is dead, or so the story goes. A string of PC games released this year, with the most recent being Alan Wake 2, have come under fire for basically requiring some form of upscaling to achieve decent performance. Understandably, there's been some backlash from PC gamers, who feel as if the idea of running a game at native resolution is quickly becoming a bygone era.

There's some truth to that, but the idea that games will rely on half-baked upscalers to achieve reasonable performance instead of "optimization" is misguided at best -- and downright inaccurate at worst. Tools like Nvidia's Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) and AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution (FSR) will continue to be a cornerstone of PC gaming, but here's why they can't replace native resolution entirely.
The outcry
Let's start with why PC gamers have the impression that native resolution is dead. The most recent outcry came over Alan Wake 2 when the system requirements revealed that the game was built around having either DLSS or FSR turned on. That's not a new scenario, either. The developers of Remnant 2 confirmed the game was designed around upscaling, and you'd be hard-pressed to find a AAA release in the last few years that didn't pack in upscaling tech.

Read more
I bought Nvidia’s worst-value GPU, but I don’t regret it
MSI RTX 4080 Suprim X installed in a PC.

After championing AMD and considering using it in my next build, I still ended up buying one of Nvidia's best graphics cards -- although arguably, the GPU in question is also among Nvidia's worst. Sure, it's a powerful card, but in terms of value, it's probably one of the worst options I could have gone with.

I'm talking about the RTX 4080. There's no doubt it can blitz through any game you can throw at it, as you can read in our RTX 4080 review, but it's also $1,200 -- a full $500 more than last-gen's RTX 3080.

Read more
AMD might still have some next-gen GPUs left in the tank — but I don’t buy it
AMD RX 7600 on a pink background.

AMD has said it's done with new GPU dies, but a filing with the European Economic Commission (EEC) suggests that Team Red could still launch graphics cards in its RX 7000 range.

The filing points to AMD releasing an RX 7600 XT sometime in the future, both in 12GB and 10GB variants. AMD's Scott Herkelman says the RDNA 3 lineup is "complete," so what gives? It comes down to the GPU dies.

Read more