Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

CryptXXX ransomware gets even tougher to crack, pulls in $45,000 in three weeks

Add as a preferred source on Google

The authors of the CryptXXX ransomware have pulled in more than $45,000 in ransoms in just three weeks, based on the transactions coming into the Bitcoin address associated with the malware.

SentinelOne, a security company, found that the latest version of CryptXXX is more robust and tougher to decrypt than previous iterations. These changes have apparently paid off for the crooks, who reportedly received about 70 Bitcoins in their Bitcoin wallet since June 4. As of this writing, that’s worth just over $45,000.

Recommended Videos

The firm notes that the people behind the scheme quickly moved the funds from this address, which was active from June 4-21.

It’s likely that they are using a Bitcoin tumbler, which obscures the details of the next wallet, to cover their tracks. They’ve also probably started using a new wallet since then to avoid any possible detection.

“With this kind of success, it’s likely we’ll continue to see this family and other ransomware families continue to grow and evolve,” said SentinelOne’s Caleb Fenton in a blog post.

There’s been a sort of cat-and-mouse game between ransomware creators and security companies. Kaspersky Lab recently released a decryptor software tool for users to decrypt their files free of charge, rather than pay the ransom, if they got infected by CryptXXX. The ransom is typically a couple of hundred dollars a pop.

Once this free tool was released, it forced the cybercriminals to rework their code so the encryption couldn’t be so easily broken. Then the vicious cycle continued when Kaspersky updated its own software. Now this latest version of CryptXXX once again skirts the power of the decryptor tool.

The new version also has a feature built-in that prevents retrieving backups; it does, for some reason, allow the victim to decrypt one file for free with a 512KB cap.

“This is a good idea from a psychological standpoint since the malware authors know that people are more likely to pay for something if they know that it will work,” said Fenton.

There have been previous cases of shoddily-coded ransomware variants out there that not even the authors have been able to crack after their victims have coughed up the Bitcoins.

Jonathan Keane
Jonathan is a freelance technology journalist living in Dublin, Ireland. He's previously written for publications and sites…
Windows users can finally pick when updates stop with Microsoft’s latest patch
From pausing updates on your own schedule to rolling back a broken PC in one click, here's everything new in Windows 11's July 2026 update.
Windows 11 Laptop

Patch Tuesday updates are usually a shrug-and-install affair, but Microsoft's July 2026 release actually gives you something to be excited about.

You can grab this update, tagged KB5101650, right now through Settings, or manually via the Microsoft Update Catalog if you'd rather not wait for it to roll out.

Read more
Can AI audiobooks narrate better than humans? This study says many listeners think so
New study finds listeners favor AI narrated audiobooks over traditional human narration in blind testing.
Audiobooks on Spotify on an iPhone.

You might assume most listeners would pick a real human voice over a synthetic one, but a new study says otherwise. Edison Research at SSRS surveyed 1,005 fiction audiobook fans in May 2026 for a study commissioned by AI audio company Spoken. The twist is that listeners rated the AI narration higher, and they did not even know it was AI until after they heard it (via Variety).

Why listeners favored the AI narration

Read more
Gemini can make sense of the world around you, but don’t let it observe your children just yet
AI can spot what a child is doing, but figuring out what it means still takes a human expert
Kid using an iPad

Google's Gemini models are becoming remarkably good at understanding videos, images, and conversations. A new study shows AI can even identify subtle behaviors in parent-child interactions with impressive accuracy. But here's the catch: while Gemini can reliably observe what is happening, researchers say it should not be trusted to decide what those behaviors actually mean.

Worth noting is that the study used Gemini 2.5 Pro, which is not Google's most advanced AI. That means future models could improve the results even further. Even so, the researchers argue that human experts remain essential.

Read more