Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Dell to Pay New York $4 Million to Resolve Fraud Charges

Add as a preferred source on Google

DellNY-lawsuitNew York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has announced that computer maker Dell will be paying some $4 million to resolve charged the company engaged in false advertising, deceptive practices, and outright fraud. In addition to paying the penalties, Dell will also have to change its marketing and financing practices.

“Today’s announcement is the final step in ensuring New Yorkers harmed by Dell’s deceptive and illegal business practices are fully compensated,” said Cuomo, in a statement. “Going forward, this deal means that Dell will have to clearly and fully disclose the terms and conditions of their products and services, to avoid this kind of fraud at the consumer’s expense.”

Recommended Videos

The case goes back to 2007 when Cuomo dues Dell, alleging the company engaged in bait-and-switch advertising tactics to sell its computers, and failed to deliver “expedited” services to customers. In 2008, a judge ruled that Dell had engaged in deceptive advertising by luring customers with promises of “no interest” and “no payment” financing, then rejected the vast majority of applicants—even those with solid credit scores—and instead offered financing with interest rates as high as 30 percent.

As part of the mandated changes, Dell advertisements will have to indicate the estimated percentage of customers who will actually qualify for the promoted financing offers. Consumers purchasing expedited customer service agreements will also have to be informed before paying any money that they might be required to engage in length diagnostic sessions over the phone with Dell customer service reps, and that might include opening up the computer to fiddle with components themselves.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more