Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Firefox Now The Most Vulnerable Browser?

Add as a preferred source on Google
Firefox logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The number of security vulnerabilities in Microsoft’s Internet Explorer Web browser were so numerous for so long that it was routinely flagged as the most vulnerable Web browser on the market—in no small part because it was also the most widely-used browser on the market. However, competitors like Firefox have been gradually eroding Microsoft’s browser share…and now they’re starting to feel more security pressures themselves. In fact, Web security firm Cenzic has just released its application security vulnerability report for the first half of 2009 (PDF), and guess what browser tops the list? Firefox.

According to Cenzic, some 44 percent of the browser vulnerabilities uncovered in the first half of 2009 were in Firefox. Apple’s Safari Web browser came in second with 35 percent, while Internet Explorer came in third place with 15 percent. Opera managed a fourth place finish with 6 percent of browser vulnerabilities found during the first half of the year.

Recommended Videos

Cenzic notes that the percentage of vulnerabilities reported for Safari is mainly due to problems found in the iPhone’s version of the browser, rather than the desktop version for Mac OS X and Windows.

The figures are a marked change from the second half of 2008, when Internet Explorer accounted for 43 percent of reported browser vulnerabilities—although even then, Firefox wasn’t far behind, with 39 percent.

Firefox’s plug-in architecture is widely seen as one of Firefox’s weakest points; Mozilla has recently launched a plug-in checking service to help users make sure they’re using the latest versions of plug-ins, and the organization released key updates in April 2009 to address several plug-in vulnerabilities.

Cenzic’s analysis doesn’t make any distinction between security vulnerabilities that were corrected and vulnerabilities that have actually been exploited in the real world, which means that although Firefox had the most vulnerabilities reported, that doesn’t actually mean its the least secure browser…or that Opera is the most secure.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more