Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Meet the computer 100 million times faster than classic systems – sometimes

Add as a preferred source on Google

While there’s no disagreement over the idea that quantum computing could open up new worlds of speed and performance for computers, there’s still a lot of debate over how effective it actually is, and even more around current implementations. Throwing caution to the wind, Google bought a D-Wave quantum annealing computer, and has spent the last two years testing it at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Mountain View, California The results of those tests are impressive to say the least. In calculation areas the computer is built for, it’s as much as 100 million times faster than a traditional computer.

Hold on to your hats folks, it’s about to get technical. While traditional computers store information in bits, composed of 1s and 0s, a quantum computer instead stores that information in qubits, which can be 0, 1, or a superposition of both. Instead of simply reading and affecting that data, the system instead generates a probability that each string of qubits will be a certain possible value. It leverages the fact that these bits exist in an entangled state, in pairs in the case of the D-Wave X2, where their value can’t be described without solving the whole set.

Recommended Videos

More important than the nitty-gritty of how it actually works is what effect it has on real-world computing. The implications of Google’s tests confirm that quantum computing is real, and works well even in the early stages of its development. Still, Google is sure to temper expectations, especially when it comes to personal computing applications. Right now, quantum annealing shows the most promise for calculations as they approach 1000 binary variables, a nonexistent occurrence in daily desktop or laptop use.

If you want to really dive deep into the results of Google and NASA’s cooperative effort, the report is online in all of its technically detailed glory. Google’s blog post summarizing the report is decidedly more straightforward, but still contains a lot of esoteric computing jargon – you’ve been warned.

Brad Bourque
Brad Bourque is a native Portlander, devout nerd, and craft beer enthusiast. He studied creative writing at Willamette…
DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names
Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.
DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Read more
A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI
This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.
ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more