Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. News

Google warns that security questions aren’t that secure

Add as a preferred source on Google

Though we mainly see them online these days, security questions predate the Internet by quite a bit. Banks, for example, have commonly used questions like “what is your mother’s maiden name?” since the beginning of the 20th century. There’s a problem though: Google says that despite their widespread use, security questions aren’t actually all that secure.

The main problem with security questions is that they’re either easy to remember or hard to guess, but very rarely both, according to a research paper Google recently presented at WWW 2015.

Recommended Videos

Google has a unique advantage when it comes to studying this subject, as it has access to a huge amount of data. A team of researchers analyzed “hundreds of millions” of questions and answers that had been used for Google account recovery claims, according to a post on the Google Online Security Blog.

The researchers found that many of the most common questions could be answered correctly within ten guesses, with a success rate between 21 and 39 percent, depending on the question. With a single guess, an attacker had a nearly 20 percent chance of guessing the answer to the question “what is your favorite food?” The usual answer? Pizza.

You may have seen advice that answering security questions with “wrong” answers is a better tactic, but Google’s researchers found that this often backfired, making the answers not harder but easier to guess, as many third parties choose the same false answers.

The problem is compounded by the fact that answers that are more difficult to guess are also more difficult to remember. Research shows that using two different security questions reduced an attacker’s chance to correctly guess the answer within ten attempts to less than one percent, but that users only remembered the answers to both questions 59 percent of the time.

So what are we supposed to do? Google proposes avoiding security questions entirely, using backup codes sent via text message or other forms of two-factor authentication instead. It isn’t as easy, but it is more secure.

For more information, see the full paper, enticingly entitled Secrets, Lies, and Account Recovery: Lessons from the Use of Personal Knowledge Questions at Google, which is available for free on Google Research.

Kris Wouk
Former Contributor
Kris Wouk is a tech writer, gadget reviewer, blogger, and whatever it's called when someone makes videos for the web. In his…
This app turns the iPhone Duo into a pocket-sized Mac
Headroom uses macOS's built-in Screen Sharing to let users control their Mac from the foldable iPhone, without installing additional software on the computer.
Headroom App on Apple iPhone Duo controlling a Mac

The iPhone Duo has barely been out for a day, and someone's already found a way to run their Mac on it. Well, sort of. Headroom, a remote desktop app from MusicFlow, lets users control their Mac from Apple's new foldable phone, with an interface that adapts as the device opens, closes, and folds in half. Think of it as turning a pocket-sized phone into a miniature MacBook, minus the actual MacBook.

Headroom turns the iPhone Duo into a mini Mac

Read more
AI helped uncover a hidden PHP flaw. Now websites worldwide are facing millions of hacking attempts.
A critical PHP vulnerability has websites worldwide racing to install security patches.
php-flaw-websites-under-attack

PHP is the programming language behind roughly 70% of websites, and it just ran into a serious problem. Security researchers used AI to uncover a critical flaw called PHP2Shell, which could let attackers take over web servers, steal data, or disrupt online services. Since the discovery, websites worldwide have been hit with millions of attempts to exploit it.

Hackers moved fast once the flaw went public. Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said the attack attempts jumped from tens of thousands within 45 minutes to millions overnight, The Guardian reports.

Read more
Microsoft has begun rolling out Copilot Code for building apps with natural language
The workplace-focused vibe coding tool can pull context from emails, documents, meetings, and chats.
Microsoft Copilot code logo

Microsoft introduced Code last month as one of the three core parts of its revamped Copilot app. The app was pitched as an easy-to-use coding agent that lets users describe what they want to build in natural language, like an app, a tracker, a dashboard, an automation, or a workflow, and Copilot would build it for them.

Essentially, it's a workplace-focused vibe-coding app that turns existing work into a functional app, and Microsoft has begun rolling it out through the Frontier program.

Read more