Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. News

Google warns that security questions aren’t that secure

Add as a preferred source on Google

Though we mainly see them online these days, security questions predate the Internet by quite a bit. Banks, for example, have commonly used questions like “what is your mother’s maiden name?” since the beginning of the 20th century. There’s a problem though: Google says that despite their widespread use, security questions aren’t actually all that secure.

The main problem with security questions is that they’re either easy to remember or hard to guess, but very rarely both, according to a research paper Google recently presented at WWW 2015.

Recommended Videos

Google has a unique advantage when it comes to studying this subject, as it has access to a huge amount of data. A team of researchers analyzed “hundreds of millions” of questions and answers that had been used for Google account recovery claims, according to a post on the Google Online Security Blog.

The researchers found that many of the most common questions could be answered correctly within ten guesses, with a success rate between 21 and 39 percent, depending on the question. With a single guess, an attacker had a nearly 20 percent chance of guessing the answer to the question “what is your favorite food?” The usual answer? Pizza.

You may have seen advice that answering security questions with “wrong” answers is a better tactic, but Google’s researchers found that this often backfired, making the answers not harder but easier to guess, as many third parties choose the same false answers.

The problem is compounded by the fact that answers that are more difficult to guess are also more difficult to remember. Research shows that using two different security questions reduced an attacker’s chance to correctly guess the answer within ten attempts to less than one percent, but that users only remembered the answers to both questions 59 percent of the time.

So what are we supposed to do? Google proposes avoiding security questions entirely, using backup codes sent via text message or other forms of two-factor authentication instead. It isn’t as easy, but it is more secure.

For more information, see the full paper, enticingly entitled Secrets, Lies, and Account Recovery: Lessons from the Use of Personal Knowledge Questions at Google, which is available for free on Google Research.

Kris Wouk
Former Contributor
Kris Wouk is a tech writer, gadget reviewer, blogger, and whatever it's called when someone makes videos for the web. In his…
DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names
Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.
DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Read more
A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI
This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.
ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more