Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Hearst Planning Large-Format e-Reader?

Add as a preferred source on Google
Hearst Planning Large-Format e-Reader?
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Industry reports have periodical publisher Hearst looking to get into the wireless e-reader market this year with a large-format wireless device specifically tailored to the reading (and advertising) requirements of newspapers and periodicals. Although the device would certainly be compared with Amazon’s Kindle reader, Hearst is reportedly eschewing the book market and looking to create a device which brings the existing business model for periodicals and newspapers into the mobile, digital age.

Sources close to Hearst indicate Hearst is planning the first decide to be about the size of a standard sheet of paper, with the larger screen size intended to both reproduce the more-complex layouts of print periodicals as well as letting advertisers buy spots in the sizes and format they’re already used to. The first device is likely to be a greyscale, eInk-based affair (Hearst was an early investor in eInk) but future models would likely incorporate a color display to accommodate high-end print publications. Some speculation indicates Hearst is exploring making the device foldable or rollable to enhance portability.

Recommended Videos

Unlike Amazon, which works with publishers to offer a single storefront for books and content for the Kindle, Hearst is apparently eyeballing a business model wherein it would sell its readers to publishers directly and possibly take a cut of revenue for advertising and content sales to those devices. Reports and sources don’t offer consistent timetable for Hearst’s plans, but some reports indicate the company would like to bring the product to market in 2009.

Hearst publishes well-known, photo-heavy publications like Esquire, Seventeen,Cosmopolitan, and O, The Oprah Magazine.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more