Skip to main content

Recount on the way amid hacking fears, questions about electronic votes

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has raised the $2.5 million dollars necessary to initiate a recount in key swing states — after computer scientists and election lawyers revealed “persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked.”

“Over the last 48-72 hours, reports have come in from experts, cyberexperts, who are reporting to us some very troubling news about the possibility of security breaches in voting results across this country,” Stein campaign manager David Cobb said in a video posted Wednesday to Facebook. The Green party will launch recount efforts in the next few days; filing dates for recounts are immediate — as soon as Friday, he said.

Recommended Videos

Stein and the Green Party have raised more than $3.4 million dollars as of early Thursday morning, per the group’s fundraising site.

The researchers, including prominent names like voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and director of the University of Michigan’s Center for Computer Security and Society J. Alex Halderman, described two possible scenarios. In one, electronic voting machines are simply off — “systematically wrong,” Halderman said. Researchers noted significantly fewer votes for Hillary Clinton from electronic machines than in nearby counties with paper ballots.

Beyond that lies the potential for hackers to have targeted the machines, a potential given concerns throughout the election cycle that Russians were involved in various efforts to hack servers and influence voters.

“Could anyone be brazen enough to try such an attack?” he asked in a Medium post on Wednesday. “A few years ago, I might have said that sounds like science fiction, but 2016 has seen unprecedented cyberattacks aimed at interfering with the election.”

Clinton is already ahead in the election by over 2 million popular votes — but the U.S. election is decided by the Electoral College, not by the popular vote.

This is by no means the first time that concerns over hacking have emerged this election cycle. Before November 8, Trump himself constantly remarked on the “rigged” system, and in the weeks leading up to Election Day, reports surfaced that the voter registration systems of more than 20 states may have been hacked. However, to suggest that the results of the election may indeed have been affected by such activity is a novel development.

As New York Magazine reported, researchers informed Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and campaign general counsel Marc Elias of potential discrepancies last Thursday, noting that “in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots. Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000.”

No one has yet found definitive evidence of either hacking or manipulation. Rather, much of the suspicion arises from questionable patterns that experts argue require a third-party review. But would it actually be enough to overturn the results? Presently, Trump has 290 Electoral College votes, whereas Clinton has 232. Michigan and its 16 votes have yet to be awarded because the race remains too close to call. If the results in both Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were reversed (for a total of 30 votes), and Clinton were to win Michigan, then she would have the necessary 270 votes.

“I’m interested in verifying the vote,” Dr. Barbara Simons, an adviser to the U.S. election assistance commission and expert on electronic voting, told the Guardian. “We need to have post-election ballot audits.”

Currently, no state is actually planning to cross check electronic results against paper records, Halderman said.

“Examining the physical evidence in these states — even if it finds nothing amiss — will help allay doubt and give voters justified confidence that the results are accurate.”

Updated 11/24/2016 by Jeremy Kaplan: Added news of recount plans by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
The Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 gaming monitor is 55% off, but there’s a catch
Samsung's Odyssey Neo G7 on a desk.

The 43-inch Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 gaming monitor is an excellent display for gamers, but it's not always available with a discount from monitor deals, and it's pretty expensive at its original price of $1,000. However, we've found a way for you to get it with a 55% discount, and that's to take advantage of Samsung's open box pricing so that you'll only have to pay $450. That's a massive $550 in savings, and you don't have to worry about the quality of the gaming monitor -- open box products still look brand new and are tested to be working properly. You need to hurry though, as stocks are limited!

Why you should buy the 43-inch Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 gaming monitor

Read more
This quirky AI-powered camera prints poems, not photos
The Poetry Camera.

The Poetry Camera is an ingenious device that doesn’t take photos but instead makes poems.

The clever contraption features a lens that observes its surroundings before using AI to craft a poem inspired by the scene. It then prints the verse through a slot on the front -- similar to how a Polaroid camera delivers photos. You can see it in action in the video above.

Read more
I loved this AI-first web browser, but experts warned me of ‘free’ AI
Launch screen of Dia browser.

“If you're not paying for the product, you are the product.” 

Bogdan Onikiienko, an engineer at MacPaw, dropped that hard-hitting quote on me after using Dia, a new-age web browser that heavily relies on AI. He found it quite useful, but warned me that there are still a few unknowns, especially the privacy aspect.

Read more