Skip to main content

Oracle says your old Java executable might install malware

java installer binary planting exploit oracle sign headquarters hq header
Ken Wolter/123rf
Delete your old Java installers: they could be compromised.

If your downloads folder is a mess of installers and documents from ages past, you might occasionally check it before downloading a piece of software like Java. Oracle put out a statement Friday saying that those old installers might be compromised by files you’ve downloaded since, and that the only safe thing to do is delete the installer and download a fresh copy of Java.

The old installers are vulnerable to an exploit called binary planting, PC World is reporting. Older Java installers check the current directory and load up a number of DLL files, meaning any user who is tricked into downloading a malicious DLL could wind up giving attackers near total access to their computer.

“If successfully exploited, it results in a complete compromise of the unsuspecting user’s system,” wrote Eric P. Maurice, Oracle’s software security assurance director, who further explained that actually taking advantage of the security hole would be difficult.

“To be successfully exploited, this vulnerability requires that an unsuspecting user be tricked into visiting a malicious website, and downloading files to the user’s system before installing Java 6, 7, or 8,” he said. It’s an unlikely sequence, but not impossible — especially considering the way files tend to cluster in the downloads file and overwhelm users.

Oracle has issued a patched installer that addresses the issue, but the firm can’t retroactively patch installers already on your computer. Oracle outlined the specific versions that were vulnerable: “Java SE users who have downloaded any old version of Java SE prior to 6u113, 7u97, or 8u73 for later installation should discard these old downloads and replace them with 6u113, 7u97, or 8u73 or later,” the notice from Oracle states.

But if you really want to protect yourself from these exploits, keep your downloads folder tidy. If you don’t recognize a file there, delete it, otherwise store it somewhere else. If that’s too much effort, consider dragging executables to their own folder before running them.

Editors' Recommendations

Justin Pot
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Justin's always had a passion for trying out new software, asking questions, and explaining things – tech journalism is the…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more