Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Mac Prices Double PCs on Average

Add as a preferred source on Google
Mac Prices Double PCs on Average
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s common knowledge that Macs carry a premium over their Windows-based competition. Anyone who has ever peeked at a Sunday newspaper circular knows that Mac buyers ante up more, but crunching the numbers on just how much churns up quite an impressive statistic: they cost double on average.

Eweek’s own Mac advocate Joe Wilcox consulted the marketing research firm NPD Group in his quest for numbers and found that on average, PC notebooks sell for $700 while Mac notebooks sell for $1,515, 2.1 times as much. If that sounds like old news, it’s not: The gap has actually widened significantly in just two years as PC prices plunge lower and Macs hover around the same. Back in June 2006, for instance, the average PC notebook ran for $877, while Macs were still at $1,574, putting them at 1.8 times as much.

Recommended Videos

Taking hardware specs into account doesn’t do Apple any favors, as comparing mid-priced machines from both sides of the brand equation often turns up a Windows machine that has better specs than its Mac equivalent, and costs half as much. Wilcox’s own example using an iMac and a Dell Inspiron shows that PCs may come up short on frills like webcams and Bluetooth, but still manage to outstrip their more expensive Mac counterparts in essentials like processor speed, RAM, and hard drive capacity.

But the trend could be headed the opposite direction in the future. Apple forewarned investors in July that margins would drop in the future, likely meaning lower prices, and the continual drop in PC prices that has been driving the disparity ever higher seems to have slowed down as well.

Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
Topics
Parents worry AI is becoming a crutch for their kids while schools struggle to keep up, survey finds
Only 1 in 3 schools has AI guidelines as nearly 50% parents grow anxious about kids leaning on AI too much.
a boy using iPhone

Kids are using AI for their homework, and half of their parents are not sure that's a good thing. Deloitte's 2026 Back-to-School Survey, which polled 1,207 parents of K-12 students, found that 49% worry their child relies on AI too much.

The findings suggest AI adoption is moving far faster than the policies meant to guide it, leaving many parents unsure how these tools are being used in education.

Read more
Samsung wants to put its own chip in your next PC and it’s all about speeding up AI chores
Samsung Custom Chip

Samsung may be plotting a new entry into the PC chip business. A new report from the Korea Economic Daily says Samsung’s System LSI division is developing a dedicated AI accelerator for PCs called Gaia. The company has reportedly supplied early samples to Lenovo and HP for performance testing, with mass production potentially beginning as early as 2027.

Prominent Samsung leaker Ice Universe described the project as the company’s return to the PC processor market after roughly 13 years. However, the details point toward something slightly different from a traditional laptop processor. Gaia might be a specialized companion chip designed to handle artificial intelligence workloads rather than a complete replacement for an Intel, AMD, or Qualcomm CPU.

Read more
AI image generators have escaped nightmare fingers and entered the fake premium era
Meta Muse, Gemini, and ChatGPT can now make clean, usable images. They also keep making reality look like a product render with feelings.
Terminal, Railway, Train

I expected this comparison to be uglier. Meta Muse, Gemini Nano Banana 2, and ChatGPT Images 2.0 sounded like a perfect setup for plastic faces, mangled hands, fake products, and posters written in haunted alphabet soup. Instead, they were mostly competent, which somehow made the whole thing more suspicious.

These aren’t identical tools wearing different logos. Meta pitches Muse Image as a social image model living inside Meta AI and its apps. Google frames Nano Banana 2 around speed, editing, and Gemini’s broader knowledge. OpenAI sells ChatGPT Images 2.0 on text rendering, visual control, and stronger prompt handling. Different ambitions, same polished little showroom.

Read more