Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Apple
  4. News

Another bug in new MacBook Pros: Some don't know what graphics card is installed

Add as a preferred source on Google

Some new MacBook Pro owners are noticing weird inconsistencies in what graphics cards their laptops think they’re running. According to a MacRumors report, in some cases the laptop reports it is running Intel’s Iris Pro 580 integrated graphics card rather than the lower-end Intel HD Graphics 530 that Apple’s own specs list.

While initial reports found the issue on laptops with Apple’s retail stores (leading some to believe Apple was using better graphics cards on its demo computers), that’s not the case. Several readers reported a similar inconsistency on laptops sold to them, indicating some type of issue.

Recommended Videos

It does appear to be a bug within MacOS Sierra. Some reports note that the type of card reported changes depending on whether or not it was plugged to external power. The lower-end card is listed when running on battery power, but the Iris Pro 580 when it’s plugged in.

More evidence that Apple is indeed using the HD Graphics 530 is found in the Device ID string, which is listed as “191b.” That’s the string for the card listed in the specs.

Iris Pro 580 graphics cards are only intended to work with Intel’s Core i5-6350HQ and Core i7-6770/6870/6970HQ mobile processors, which are not included in any of the new MacBook Pros. While just speculation, Apple instead opted for lower end processors within the Skylake family, likely in an effort to extend battery life.

At least for now, it doesn’t appear as if the reporting inaccuracies are anything more than just a “reporting error,” as no users reported any type of show-stopping problem. Even so, it’s yet another black mark for Apple’s latest laptop.

Friday’s report is the second in as many days on Apple’s stumbles with the new MacBook Pro. On Thursday, reports surfaced that the laptop’s System Integrity Protection feature was disabled on some Touch Bar MacBook Pro models, potentially opening up users to malware attacks.

Apple has so far not commented publicly on the issue.

Ed Oswald
For fifteen years, Ed has written about the latest and greatest in gadgets and technology trends. At Digital Trends, he's…
Windows users can finally pick when updates stop with Microsoft’s latest patch
From pausing updates on your own schedule to rolling back a broken PC in one click, here's everything new in Windows 11's July 2026 update.
Windows 11 Laptop

Patch Tuesday updates are usually a shrug-and-install affair, but Microsoft's July 2026 release actually gives you something to be excited about.

You can grab this update, tagged KB5101650, right now through Settings, or manually via the Microsoft Update Catalog if you'd rather not wait for it to roll out.

Read more
Can AI audiobooks narrate better than humans? This study says many listeners think so
New study finds listeners favor AI narrated audiobooks over traditional human narration in blind testing.
Audiobooks on Spotify on an iPhone.

You might assume most listeners would pick a real human voice over a synthetic one, but a new study says otherwise. Edison Research at SSRS surveyed 1,005 fiction audiobook fans in May 2026 for a study commissioned by AI audio company Spoken. The twist is that listeners rated the AI narration higher, and they did not even know it was AI until after they heard it (via Variety).

Why listeners favored the AI narration

Read more
Gemini can make sense of the world around you, but don’t let it observe your children just yet
AI can spot what a child is doing, but figuring out what it means still takes a human expert
Kid using an iPad

Google's Gemini models are becoming remarkably good at understanding videos, images, and conversations. A new study shows AI can even identify subtle behaviors in parent-child interactions with impressive accuracy. But here's the catch: while Gemini can reliably observe what is happening, researchers say it should not be trusted to decide what those behaviors actually mean.

Worth noting is that the study used Gemini 2.5 Pro, which is not Google's most advanced AI. That means future models could improve the results even further. Even so, the researchers argue that human experts remain essential.

Read more