Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

MessageLabs: 90 Pct of Email is Spam, 80 Pct of Spam from Botnets

Add as a preferred source on Google
MessageLabs: 90 Pct of Email is Spam, 80 Pct of Spam from Botnets
Image used with permission by copyright holder

MessageLabs has released its June 2009 MessageLabs Intelligence Report (PDF) covering spam, both via instant messaging and email. Overall, MessageLabs finds that some 90.4 percent of all email traversing the Internet is spam, a figure that’s essentially right in line with May 2009…but MessageLabs attributes that to a several-hour shutdown of a leading bot network in early June; otherwise, June’s spam levels would likely have been higher than spam in May.

MessageLabs found that spam from botnets accounted for 83.2 percent of all spam in June, with most of the remainder being sent from compromised mail servers and Web-based email services.

Recommended Videos

MessageLabs also found significant regional variations in spam levels: for instance, spam levels in France increased by 8.6 percent in June (making it the most-spammed country) and Germany’s spam rate hit 96 percent of all email, with the Netherlands close behind at 93.9 percent. Spam levels in the United States, conversely, amounted to a mere 78.4 percent of all email, and Canada is even further under the radar, with spam accounting for just 72.2 percent of all email.

The report notes that the FTC-mandated shutdown of the California-based ISP Pricewert significantly cut into the output from Cutwail, believed to be the largest spam-producing botnet responsible for about 45 percent of all spam. However, unlike the McColo shutdown in late 2008—which caused worldwide spam levels to drop for some months—Cutwail was able to recover to one third of its typical spam-producing levels within a few hours, indicating the botnet has successfully diversified its command-and-control architecture.

MessageLabs also found that about 1 in 78 instant messages containing a hyperlink point to a site hosting malicious content.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more