Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Microsoft Can Keep Selling Word While Appealing Patent Ruling

Add as a preferred source on Google

Microsoft WordLast month, a Texas judge handed down some $290 million in fines against Microsoft Corporation for infringing on patents held by Canadian company i4i related to custom XML documents—and in addition to the financial penalty, the judge ordered Microsoft stop selling infringing products—in this case Microsoft Word 2004 and 2007—and gave Microsoft 60 days to comply.

Microsoft immediately appealed the ruling and, surprising almost nobody, U.s. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found Microsoft has met the requirements to be granted a stay on the injunction—in other words, the company can continue selling Microsoft Word while its appeal on the patent infringement case wends its way through the courts. The appeals court also granted an expedited review of the case, and will hear arguments on September 23.

Recommended Videos

The initial infringement ruling against Microsoft was unexpectedly harsh, with east Texas judge Leonard Davis ordering Microsoft to pay $40 million for willful infringement, $37 million in pre-judgement interest, $21,102 for every day until a final judgement was reached, and some $144,060 per day until a final judgement on damages was reached.

For its part, i4i isn’t some patent troll with no other business than trying to milk money off Microsoft: the company has been in business since 1993 and develops collaborate content management systems, with clients in the pharmaceutical industry.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more