Skip to main content

Microsoft Opposes Google-DoubleClick Merger

Microsoft Opposes Google-DoubleClick Merger

In an ironic twist, Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday in opposition to the proposed merger between Internet titan Google and online advertising giant DoubleClick. The proposed deal is facing antitrust scrutiny as competition heats up in the Internet advertising arena. While acknowledging the industry is very fluid with companies like Yahoo, AOL, and even Microsoft (which just paid over $6 billion for aQuantive) making large moves in recent months, Smith still told the Committee that Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick poses "an imminent risk of giving a single company the degree of market power that could foreclose competition."

The concern is that if a single player were to become dominant in the online marketing world, it could set arbitrary prices for online advertising without fear of being meaningfully undercut by competition: advertisers would have no choice but to pay whatever exhorbitant rate the market leader demanded, or (essentially) no one would see their ads. A study just published by the AEI-Brookings Joint Center on Regulatory Studies—and partially funded by Microsoft and AT&T—suggests a combined Google/DoubleClick would do so. The report’s authors, Robert Hahn and Hal Singer, conclude: "A combined Google-DoubleClick would have greater incentive to increase the price of DoubleClick’s advertiser tools relative to a standalone DoubleClick."

Recommended Videos

Smith also speculated that a Google/DoubleClick merger could have negative impacts on Internet users’ privacy, especially of Google and DoubleClick were to pool their respective databases of user demographics and behaviors.

Microsoft and—by proxy—AT&T citing antitrust concerns before a Senate Committee is ironic, since both companies have been found to have abused monopoly power in their markets.

Google downplayed concerns over the merger, and promise to address privacy issues by enabling users to opt out of usage and behavioral tracking. In a letter read by Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY), Google CEO Eric Schmidt said Google was exploring the idea of enabling users to disable Google’s tracking cookies.

Google also believes the acquisition does not raise any antitrust concerns, arguing on its public policy blog that Google’s and DoubleClick’s businesses are complementary rather than competitive, since DoubleClick is primarily an advertising distributor and does not buy or sell ads or advertising space.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Nomad’s genius cable may have just solved my travel charging conundrum
The Nomad Universal Cable for Apple Watch being used to charge Apple devices.

I have a very niche confession to make: I hate packing charging cables when I travel. Yes, I know, that isn’t exactly the most pressing problem that the world is facing right now. But that doesn’t mean it’s not an annoying chore every time I head away from home.

All of the devices I take with me are USB-C. My MacBook has been for years, as has my Apple Watch’s charging puck. And thanks to the magic of the European Union, my iPhone now comes with a USB-C charging port too. You’d think that would make my cable packing simple: just grab a few USB-C ones and off I go.

Read more
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D accounts for nearly all Zen 5 sales
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

Recent sales data from German retailer MindFactory highlights a striking trend in AMD’s Zen 5 CPU lineup, with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D accounting for nearly 90% of all Ryzen 9000-series sales. The latest figures indicate that consumers overwhelmingly prefer this gaming-optimized processor over other models in the lineup.

In January 2025, MindFactory recorded 25,625 total CPU sales, with AMD capturing 92.16% of the market—equivalent to 23,615 units. Intel, by contrast, managed to sell just 2,010 processors, reinforcing AMD’s dominance in the consumer market.

Read more
Google puts military use of AI back on the table
First step of Gemini processing a PDF in Files by Google app.

On February 4, Google updated its “AI principles,” a document detailing how the company would and wouldn’t use artificial intelligence in its products and services. The old version was split into two sections: “Objectives for AI applications” and “AI applications we will not pursue,” and it explicitly promised not to develop AI weapons or surveillance tools.

The update was first noticed by The Washington Post, and the most glaring difference is the complete disappearance of any “AI applications we will not pursue” section. In fact, the language of the document now focuses solely on “what Google will do,” with no promises at all about “what Google won’t do.”

Read more