Skip to main content

The Opera browser now supposedly sips laptop battery juice thanks to a new power saving mode

opera power saving mode
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There’s no question that the browser market is a very competitive one, with Microsoft, Google, Apple, Mozilla, and Opera fighting for consumer eyeballs. In fact, just recently Mozilla released a new extension for its Firefox browser that lets users ultimately decide what features will be made available to the public. Now Opera has called that bluff and raised the stakes even more by throwing a dedicated power saving mode into its popular desktop browser.

This is big news, as a good chunk of the general consumer market relies on laptops and tablet/laptop hybrids. Battery life extension is one of the hottest topics in the mobile market today as consumers surf the Internet in their cars, on the plane, and even at the park. Hardware and software developers are struggling to push those power savings to the max, and Opera seems to be latest to jump on that trend.

Opera’s Pawel Miniewicz claimed in a recent blog that the desktop version of the Opera browser can extend the user’s battery life by up to 50-percent while browsing thanks to the new power saving mode when compared to other browsers on the market like Google Chrome. This is a bold claim, but Miniewicz backs it up with a few numbers and a list of hardware that was used during a recent test.

Opera used two platforms in its testing process: a Lenovo ThinkPad X250 with an Intel Core i7-5600U processor and 16GB of memory, and a Dell XPS 13 with 16GB of memory. Both ran a copy of Microsoft’s 64-bit version of Windows 10, and both were set at a high performance power mode. On the software front, the company used Selenium WebDriver. It loaded 11 popular websites in separate tabs, which in turn were scrolled five times. The tests were conducted until the laptops ran out of battery juice.

According to a provided chart, the laptops lasted one hour and fifty-four minutes when using Google Chrome, and one hour and fifty-eight minutes when using Opera with the power saving mode turned off. However, when the power saving mode was switched on, the battery lasted for two hours and fifty-six minutes, a 49 percent battery life increase. Miniewicz noted that Opera’s ad blocker was also loaded during the testing process.

To keep the Opera browser from eating up the laptop’s battery, the company made a few “under the hood” adjustments. For starters, the company managed to reduce the activity in the background tabs. They also figured out how to wake the CPU less often by optimizing the scheduling of JavaScript timers. The overall framerate was reduced to 30 frames per second, and browser theme animations are paused when the power saving mode is activated. Unused plugins are also automatically paused.

Opera users can enable the power saving mode by clicking on the battery icon seated next to the search and address field within the browser. This icon will automatically appear when the laptop’s power cable is unplugged. Opera will also suggest switching over to power saving mode when the laptop’s battery reaches a 20-percent capacity.

In addition to the new power saving mode, the browser’s VPN experience received an upgrade and is now part of the private browsing mode. For example, the company disabled WebRTC support when the VPN mode is enabled because web pages could see the user’s IP address when establishing a WebRTC connection. A VPN badge now appears in a private window as well.

The new features listed in Miniewicz’s blog post can be found in the developer channel build of Opera for computers. This version is updated a few times per week, so expect it to be somewhat less stable than the version released to the general public.

Editors' Recommendations

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more