Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Politicos Unite Against AOL ‘Email Tax’

Geoff Duncan
By

Liberal political action group MoveOn.org is organizing a petition drive against America Online’s certified email service, whereby advertisers could pay a per-message fee to guarantee their messages will bypass AOL’s spam filtering technologies and be delivered directly to AOL users. Claiming the service amounts to an “email tax” by granting large email senders preferential access to AOL users mailboxes, while leaving other email users (like small businesses, friends, family members, charities, and co-workers) in the dark, wondering if their mail will get through.

Along with AOL, Yahoo is also considering allowing large emailers to pay to bypass the company’s spam filtering and access its users directly; in both cases, the service would be operated by Goodmail Systems.

Recommended Videos

Moveon.Org plans a news conference for Tuesday, February 28, where it plans to announce a number of organizations have joined in opposing the pay-to-send plan, including both liberal and conservative political groups, nonprofits, businesses, and Internet advocacy groups. Already publicly onboard is Craig Newmark, founder of the increasingly influential Craigslist online classified ad service.

Related

AOL and supports of the pay-to-send system argue the system will actually make things simpler for consumers: large emailers and brands who are seeing their communications with customers eroded by online fraud and phishing schemes can ensure their legitimate email reached customers, and customers, in turn, would be exposed to fewer fraudulent or malicious messages, and be able to recognize mail certified legitimate by Yahoo or AOL when they see it.

Others have criticized the move as cynical, arguing it’s against common interest for large providers like AOL and Yahoo to work on providing bypass routes for paying customers rather than improving antispam and antiphishing technologies for the users. MoveOn.org notes: “The moment AOL switches to a world where giant emailers pay for preferential treatment, AOL faces this internal choice: spend money to keep spam filters up-to-date so legitimate email isn’t identified as spam, or make money by neglecting their spam filters and pushing more senders to pay for guaranteed delivery. Which do you think they’ll choose?”

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
I tested Intel’s Core i5-14600K against its cheaper sibling. Don’t waste your money
Intel Core i5-13600K installed in a motherboard.

Intel's new Core i5-14600K isn't a massive generational leap, as you can read in our Core i5-14600K review. No one expected it to be with Intel's 13th-gen CPUs already sitting among the best processors. The bigger question is if it's worth buying over last-gen's Core i5-13600K considering that both are readily available for around the same price.

I've tested both chips extensively across a range of productivity and gaming scenarios. The Core i5-14600K brings some minor improvements over its last-gen counterpart, but those looking to stretch their dollar the furthest are better off sticking with the Core i5-13600K.
Pricing and availability
An Intel 13th-generation 13600K Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Read more
I tested the Intel Core i9-14900K against the Core i9-13900K, and it’s not pretty
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel's new Core i9-14900K is a tough processor to evaluate. It brings the same number of cores and the same architecture as last-gen's Core i9-13900K, but Intel asserts that the new chip delivers some performance improvements. Is that true, and is it worth ditching last-gen's flagship for what Intel claims is its best processor?

The Core i9-14900K fixes some of the weaker areas of the Core i9-13900K. However, as you can read in our Intel Core i9-14900K review, the new processor does very little to justify spending a higher price for largely the same performance.
Pricing and availability

Read more
I tested AMD’s RX 7800 XT against Nvidia’s RTX 4070, and there’s a clear winner
AMD logo on the RX 7800 XT graphics card.

With the release of the Radeon RX 7800 XT and RX 7700 XT, AMD finally set foot in the mainstream gaming sector with its RDNA 3 lineup. Nvidia, its biggest rival, which also makes some of the best graphics cards, was the first to release competing cards with similar performance -- at least on paper. But are Nvidia's options better than AMD's in this generation?

The RX 7800 XT was, from the get-go, said to be the competitor to Nvidia's RTX 4070, but in reality, these GPUs differ both in price and performance. We've tested the RX 7800 XT and compared it to the RTX 4070, and we now know which of these two GPUs is the one to pick.
Pricing and availability

Read more