Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Sun Axing Up to 3,000 Jobs Waiting for Oracle Deal to Clear

Add as a preferred source on Google
MySQL Logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Beleaguered Sun Microsystems, creators of Java and owners of the widely-used MySQL database, has revealed in an SEC filing that it plans to cut up to 3,000 jobs in the next year as it waits for European regulators to approve the company’s $7.4 billion merger with database giant Oracle. Although the deal has already been approved by the U.S. Justice Department, the European Commission isn’t expected to reach a decision until early 2010.

The 3,000 positions represent about 10 percent of Sun’s total global workforce. Layoffs will be done in phases and cover all of Sun’s major market regions, including North America, Europe, Asia, and emerging markets. The company also believes it will incur between $75 and $125 million in costs during the next year, much of which will be related to severance and restructuring charges.

Recommended Videos

The job cuts mark the second wave of layoffs at the once-mighty company; last year the company axed some 5,000 positions in a cost-cutting move, prior to entering into a takeover deal with Oracle.

One of the sticking points in the Sun-Oracle deal for the European Commission is the widely-used open-source MySQL database application. If Oracle acquires MySQL along with Sun, it will represent a significant consolidation of the database market, putting Oracle in a dominant position in both commercial enterprise databases and the open source markets. Several interested parties—including MySQL co-founder Monty Widenius—have called for regulators to require Oracle divest itself of MySQL as a condition of approving a merger with Sun.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more