Skip to main content

Trump’s executive order would hamstring U.S. innovation

On Thursday, President Trump signed an executive order that would be disastrous for U.S. innovation.

The “Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship” directs the Federal Communications Commission to narrow the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which largely protects internet companies from liability for content posted by users on their platforms. The order is not only ill-considered — it is unconstitutional. It mocks the First Amendment by seeking to dictate speech to private actors. It ignores the fact that, in our system, laws are determined by Congress and the Constitution – not by executive decree.

Recommended Videos

Moreover, this order will unfairly burden innovators and reduce our international competitiveness.

Michael Petricone
Michael Petricone is senior vice president of government affairs for the Consumer Technology Association, the U.S. trade association representing more than 2000 consumer technology companies.
trump executive order section 230 opinion michael petricone for the consumer technology association  cta

We support legitimate efforts to protect and enhance free speech. But this executive order will restrict — not promote — free expression. It is an attempt by the government to regulate social media and other tech platforms to benefit a political agenda.

For the past few months, people across the nation — and around the world — have relied on online platforms to connect and communicate. But as the economy begins to reopen, suddenly free speech is under attack — again. Yet it was Section 230 and the free speech protections enjoyed by online platforms that enabled their success and, subsequently, their ability to support struggling Americans during the pandemic. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube — the very companies the president calls out in his order — are not only hubs of critical information about the virus; they have invested over a billion dollars in supporting the news industry, small businesses, and COVID-relief charities.

Ironically, though, small businesses would be hit the hardest by a repeal. Section 230 protects platforms from a barrage of nuisance lawsuits for hosting third party speech, such as bad restaurant reviews, postings on community bulletin boards, or remarks in an online comments section. These smaller companies and startups will fold without the resources to fight these wasteful lawsuits. Any site hosting user-generated content would have to screen every single submission to avoid litigation — directing resources toward regulation instead of innovation. In other words, the biggest burden created by removing Section 230 would fall on entrepreneurs, startups, and those without huge legal budgets.

This goes against everything America stands for.

Right now, America’s internet companies — the crown jewels of our economy — lead the world in digital technology. But this will not be the case for long if Section 230 protections are weakened or removed. Our nation’s pro-free speech, light-touch regulation is the basis for our country’s thriving online economy. It’s what makes America’s tech businesses the most successful in the world.

If companies have to shift their focus from innovation to fighting lawsuits, it will hinder the development of new technology and ideas, like the ones that saved countless American lives over the past few months. The likely winner here (in addition to trial lawyers) will be China, which is spending billions in a frenetic attempt to catch up to American innovators, even as our companies are being attacked by their own government.

Section 230 protects the ability of the American public to freely exchange ideas with each other and the world. It supports the common-sense idea that responsibility for online speech lies with the speaker and ensures that internet platforms can remove offensive or inappropriate speech without fear of liability.

In the American system, the role of government is to draw the boundary lines without violating First Amendment speech restrictions, allowing new businesses to start, and encouraging the free flow of ideas.

If we allow this basic underpinning of the American system to be eroded, what comes next?

Instead of promoting unconstitutional orders, the federal government should take a narrow approach that directly targets bad actors. Instead of punishing law-abiding small businesses, efforts should be directed at the limited number of rogue websites that are actually violating the law.

This is the American way — unconstitutional and politically-motivated policies are not.

Michael Petricone
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Michael Petricone is senior vice president of government affairs for the Consumer Technology Association (CTA)®, the U.S…
Topics
Chinese hackers targeting critical U.S. infrastructure, Microsoft warns
chinese hackers caught targeting vital us infrastructure china flags

State-sponsored hackers based in China have been working to compromise critical infrastructure in the U.S., Microsoft said on Wednesday. It’s thought the attacks could lead to the disruption of important communications between the U.S. and its interests in Asia during future crises.

Notable target sites include Guam, a small island in the Pacific with an important U.S. army base that could play an important role in any clash with China over Taiwan.

Read more
Apple’s security trumps Microsoft and Twitter’s, say feds
Apple's Craig Federighi speaking about macOS security at WWDC 2022.

Apple has long held a reputation for rock-solid security, and now the U.S. government seemingly agrees after praising the company for its security procedures. At the same time, the feds have suggested Microsoft and Twitter need to pull their socks up and make their products much more secure for their users, according to CNBC.

In a speech given at Carnegie Mellon University, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Director Jen Easterly pointed to Apple as a company that took security and accountability seriously, and suggested other companies should take note.

Read more
Nreal’s Air AR glasses head to the U.S., ready to rock with iPhones
Nreal Air AR glasses

Nreal is bringing its augmented reality (AR) glasses to the U.S., and this time the company is porting over all that immersive fun to the iOS ecosystem. The Nreal Air, which have been available in the U.K. since May, carry a price tag of $379 and will be available via Amazon and authorized retail outlets starting today.

The Nreal Air is a watered-down version of the Light AR glasses, but the package is still quite compelling for the asking price. Rocking a more consumer-friendly wayfarer design similar to Facebook’s Ray-Ban Stories, the Nreal Air feature an OLED display offering an effective resolution of 3840 x 1080, the same as the pricier Light version.

Read more