Skip to main content

Why can’t your computer stream 4K yet? Crazy compression and piracy

Streaming 4k content on computer
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Amazon and Netflix recently enabled 4K streaming, an important milestone for many home viewers. Ultra HD media players remain expensive, but streaming is a possible alternative. Why spend hundreds on a 4K Blu-Ray player when a media-streaming device can fill the same role?

Yet this momentous rollout came with a major restriction: It doesn’t work with PCs. Aside from videos uploaded to YouTube, there’s currently no reliable source of Ultra HD media for computers. What’s going on, and when will this barrier be thrown down?

Foiled by format

Amazon and Netflix, the two major players in online streaming that offer UltraHD, have never given a technical reason why computers can’t play such content. For the most part the issue is entirely ignored; FAQ pages from both companies simply don’t discuss the issue, choosing to instead talk about the particulars of HDTV support or, in Amazon’s case, helpfully suggest a few Ultra HD sets viewers might want to purchase.

Better HEVC support is a problem largely in Intel’s hands.

The issue this duo tiptoes around is support for High-Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), aka H.265, the latest standard for encoding high-resolution video. Finalized in January of 2013, HEVC supports resolutions up to 8K (8,192 x 4,320) and drastically reduces file size relative to its predecessor, H.264. Its combination of high-resolution support and excellent compression without a drastic reduction in quality makes HEVC ideal for streaming 4K.

HEVC is relatively new, though, so the vast majority of computers don’t have the ability to decode it in hardware as they can H.264. That means a far slower software decode process must be used, which puts smooth 1080p video playback outside the reach of older desktops and many mobile systems. 4K of course greatly multiples the load, making smooth play even less likely.

Blame DRM, again

This explanation doesn’t explain everything, however. Even if HEVC support was the root cause, why doesn’t the option at least exist?

Blame the movie studios. For them, Ultra HD is more than just a tool to promote expensive re-masters of older movies. It’s a chance to put the genie back in the bottle. Anyone can jump on a Torrent site and quickly find a high-quality 1080p copy of a movie or TV series, and time has proven there’s no effective way to bring those copies down. With 4K, the studios are trying a different strategy; make sure the copy is never made in the first place.

hdcp playbackThis is theoretically possible thanks to High-Bandwidth Digital Content Protection, or HDCP, an encryption standard developed by Intel that prevents playback on unauthorized devices and makes the signal unreadable in between each device. The latest version, HDCP 2.2, addresses previously discovered flaws in encryption, and compatibility with it is required to display most 4K content. In this way the movie studios, with cooperation from hardware manufacturers, have found a way to make piracy of new UltraHD content very difficult.

A computer, by its very nature, is a potential loophole in this scheme. There will always be some form of screen-capture software that can turn what’s on the screen into a near-perfect copy. Allowing distribution of 4K content through a PC (or Mac) would destroy the carefully protected ecosystem the studios have worked so had to build.

When will the fortress crumble?

HDCP 2.2, as its version number indicates, isn’t an entirely new invention. The standard has been around for years and has fallen victim to exploits repeatedly. Hackers will no doubt find away around this latest incarnation. HEVC will eventually receive better support from hardware, as well. The question is: when?

4K content on computers is likely to remain a tangle of licensing fees, DRM schemes and decoder issues for some time.

Unfortunately, PC users may have to wait awhile. Predicting when HDCP 2.2 will be cracked is impossible to do with any certainty, but the timing of past exploits suggests it’ll take a few years. There’s also the possibility a particular movie studio will simply break ranks, believing the threat of piracy will be counter-balanced by the profit of being first with widespread 4K for computers, but that seems an unlikely result. The MPAA has proven unified in the past.

Better HEVC support, meanwhile, is a problem largely in Intel’s hands. It’s the only company with the reach to bring hardware-decode support to most PC owners quickly, but so far it has not implemented or even announced such a feature.

That may be because HEVC is a licensed technology, so anyone putting together an implementation for distribution of more than 100,000 units must pay a royalty of 20 cents per product. That can add up to a maximum annual royalty of $25 million. Pricing was only announced a few months ago, as well, so Intel hasn’t had much time to decide whether it’s willing to pay.

Don’t hold your breath

4K content on computers is likely to remain a tangle of licensing fees, DRM schemes and decoder issues for some time. The interests of the movie studios and the complexity of HEVC have strewn the path forward with complexity, and there’s no one at the helm to navigate PCs through it. Even native Windows support of HEVC, an important step forward, won’t be added until the release of Windows 10 late in 2015.

It’s a shame, because the 4K experience is much more affordable on a computer than in a home theater, and the added resolution provides many benefits beyond sharper video. Yet the situation is not unusual. H.264 took some time to gather widespread support, as well, and lagged the rollout of high-definition video for home theaters. The lack of direction is just the price users pay for the PC’s relatively open ecosystem.

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
The best 4K gaming monitors of 2023: ultrawides, high refresh rates, and more
Cyberpunk 2077 running on the Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 monitor.

For the most immersive gameplay, you need one of the best 4K gaming monitors. Traditionally reserved for high-end gamers with fat wallets, 4K gaming displays are becoming much cheaper.

4K gaming displays offer you a resolution of 3840 x 2160, providing over 8.2 million pixels. That gives you exceptional clarity in games, as well as a high-resolution desktop experience. It's also a demanding resolution to run, so make sure your PC is stocked with one of the best graphics cards if you want a 4K gaming display.

Read more
Asus’ 4K, 32-inch mini-LED gaming monitor might hit the perfect sweet spot
A press photo of the ROG Swift PG32UQXR.

Asus dropped another category-shaking gaming monitor at CES 2023 called the Asus ROG Swift PG32UQXR featuring DisplayPort 2.1, 4K resolution, and a large screen size.

Creating waves and competing against the best gaming monitors at CES 2023 is what Asus seems to be focusing on this year. First, it showcased the absolutely bonkers do-I-really-need-it-yes-just-because 540Hz ROG Swift Pro PG248QP -- its highest refresh rate monitor yet.

Read more
LG’s latest 4K monitor wants to be your smart home hub
The LG Smart Monitor with a Netflix show streaming on the display

You could only stream via AirPlay 2 to an overpriced Apple monitor or a Samsung smart TV -- until now. LG just released the Smart Monitor which has AirPlay 2 built into it and doubles as a smart home hub, so now you can stream from your Mac to the monitor without the need for cables.

The LG Smart Monitor 32SQ780S is a 32-inch 60Hz monitor with a 4K display mounted on an adjustable ergonomic stand. It’s a beefy boy, at nearly 25 pounds and 16 inches thick. There are USB-C ports on the back, but not much else in the way of I/O.

Read more