Skip to main content

After Friday’s attack, XiongMai recalls millions of devices that use its tech

Despite threatening many media outlets and experts with legal action for tarnishing its brand regarding last week’s massive DDoS attack, Chinese electronics firm XiongMai Technologies (XM) said on Monday that it will issue a recall of “millions of devices” that use its technology. The company also admitted that its products “suffered” due to hackers gaining access and using them illegally.

What is strange is that, according to the company, firmware was released in September 2015 to fix any security vulnerabilities. Products that shipped after that date should, by default, not be vulnerable to attacks, yet XiongMai was listed as one of the vendors whose products were used in Friday’s attack.

Recommended Videos

“Since [September 2015], XM has set the device default Telnet off to avoid the hackers to connect,” the company said. “In other words, this problem is absent at the moment for our devices after Sep 2015, as hackers cannot use the Telnet to access our devices.”

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The company added that its products now require end-users to set the username and password when they first power up the device. This prevents hackers from using generalized usernames and passwords like “admin/admin” or “admin/password” that is typically set as default by the manufacturer when a device ships.

Last week’s attack brought down many popular services on the internet in the United States including Twitter, Spotify, Reddit, Amazon, and numerous others. This was accomplished by a large distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack, which essentially floods a website’s host with so much junk data that it is either inaccessible, or is knocked offline entirely. Friday’s attack targeted a major DNS host called Dyn, firing at the company from “tens of millions of IP addresses” simultaneously.

The attack was carried out by gaining access to a massive number of internet-connected devices that use the default username and passwords assigned by the manufacturers. Part of the attack used Marai, an open source malware that scans the internet for these unprotected devices, infects them, and then opens the door for the hacker to use the device for sending a flood of junk data to a target.

Many of the devices used in the DDoS attack, which hit Dyn in at least three waves, led back to XiongMai. The company manufactures and sells a wide variety of circuit boards for DVRs as well as camera modules for webcams. While the company provided firmware to fix the former security issue in 2015, older products shipped with XiongMai’s electronics may not have the update.

A recent report revealed many infected devices linking back to XiongMai still had the default login credentials of “xc3511/xc3511.” To make matters worse, even though device owners could change the username and password through a web-based administration panel, that combo is hardcoded in the device’s firmware. Unfortunately, the tools needed to disable this default combo are not available.

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
Tesla recalls nearly a half a million vehicles over safety issues
The front of a Tesla Model 3.

Tesla is recalling nearly half a million Model 3 and Model S vehicles in the U.S. over safety issues related to the rearview camera and the trunk.

Specifically, 356,309 Tesla Model 3 electric cars (model years 2017 through 2020/production dates July 15, 2017 through September 30, 2020) have been recalled over a problem with the trunk harness coaxial cable that could wear away and cut the feed from the rearview camera to the center display.

Read more
Intel’s Panther Lake chips might not roar until 2026
The Intel Pather Lake SoC showcased at the Embedded World 2025. Captured by PC Games Hardware.

Intel’s next-generation Panther Lake laptop processors, originally expected to launch in late 2025, may now be delayed until the first quarter of 2026. The delay appears to be linked to challenges with Intel’s 18A process node, which plays a critical role in the Panther Lake architecture. This shift could affect Intel’s competitive timeline as rival chipmakers continue advancing their own next-gen processors.

According to slides obtained by VideoCardz, Intel has listed Panther Lake for a Q1 2026 release, suggesting a delay from previous expectations. These internal documents also hint that Panther Lake could be branded under the Core Ultra 300 series when it finally launches, following Intel’s recent shift in naming conventions.

Read more
I saw Google’s Gemini AI erase copyright evidence. I am deeply worried
Gemini Advanced on the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold.

The rise of generative AI has been a fairly messy process, especially from fair usage ethics and copyright perspective. AI giants are inking deals with publishers to avoid legal hassles, while at the same time, they are embroiled in copyright tussles in courts in multiple countries.
As the ravenous appetite for training AI on user data grows, we might be in for another ethical conundrum. Multiple users on X and Reddit have shared demonstrations of how Google’s latest Gemini 2.0 series AI model can remove watermarks from copyright-protected images.
Going by the before/after samples of images, it seems Gemini is doing a fairly good job of removing the watermarks. Notably, it’s not only erasing those banner-style watermarks, but also fairly complex overlays with design and stylized text elements.
https://x.com/ajiteshleo/status/1901484196972945872?s=61
The model in question is the Gemini 2.0 Flash, which was released earlier this year and got a reasoning upgrade, as well. It is worth noting here that you can not remove the watermark if you are using the mobile or desktop version of the Gemini 2.0 Flash model. Trying to do so returns a message like this:
“Removing watermarks from images without the explicit permission of the copyright holder is illegal in most countries. It is important to respect the copyright laws and intellectual property rights. If you want to use an image with a watermark, you should contact the copyright holder and ask for permission.”
You can, however, try and remove the watermark from images in the Google AI Studio. Digital Trends successfully removed watermarks from a variety of images using the Gemini 2.0 Flash (Image Generation) Experimental model.
 
It is a violation of local copyright laws and any usage of AI-modified material without due consent could land you in legal trouble. Moreover, it is a deeply unethical act, which is also why artists and authors are fighting in court over companies using their work to train AI models without duly compensating them or seeking their explicit nod.

How are the results?
A notable aspect is that the images produced by the AI are fairly high quality. Not only is it removing the watermark artifacts, but also fills the gap with intelligent pixel-level reconstruction. In its current iteration, it works somewhat like the Magic Eraser feature available in the Google Photos app for smartphones.
Furthermore, if the input image is low quality, Gemini is not only wiping off the watermark details but also upscaling the overall picture. .
https://x.com/kaiju_ya/status/1901099096930496720?s=61
The output image, however, has its own Gemini watermark, although this itself can be removed with a simple crop. There are a few minor differences in the final image produced by Gemini after its watermark removal process, such as slightly different color temperatures and fuzzy surface details in photorealistic shots.

Read more