Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Legacy Archives

SpaceShipTwo investigation reportedly focusing on structural failure, not engine explosion

Add as a preferred source on Google

It is of course very early days for the investigation team looking into Friday’s SpaceShipTwo crash in California’s Mojave Desert in which one pilot died and another was seriously injured, but it appears the focus has already shifted from a possible explosion connected with the testing of a new type of fuel to the idea that structural failure may have been the cause.

An unnamed source close to the investigation told the Wall Street Journal over the weekend that a “violent structural failure rather than an engine explosion” could be the likely reason the vehicle crashed.

Recommended Videos

The source pointed out that the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) investigation has only just started and therefore it’s likely to be some considerable time before the cause of the accident can be confidently identified. However, the idea that structural failure may be to blame appears to be a new line of inquiry for investigators after initial reports focused heavily on the testing of a new type of performance-boosting rocket fuel that some believed could have led to an explosion on board SpaceShipTwo shortly after it was released at 45,000 feet by its WhiteKnightTwo transporter aircraft.

According to the Journal, “preliminary data” received by the NTSB, which includes the news that SpaceShipTwo’s fuel tanks and engine were found “largely intact,” has caused it to shift the focus of its investigation to the powerful aerodynamic forces acting on the spacecraft, which could have caused it to break up in flight.

Speaking to reporters the day after the accident, Virgin Galactic founder Richard Branson suggested he couldn’t be sure if his ambitious space tourism project would continue.

“We owe it to our test pilots to find out what went wrong,” Branson said. “And once we find out what went wrong, if we can overcome it, we will make absolutely certain that the dream lives on.”

Virgin Galactic’s commercial space tourism service has for some time been selling seats for future flights on its six-person vehicle. Tom Hanks, Justin Bieber, Ashton Kutcher and Lady Gaga are among those who’ve forked out as much as $250,000 for a ticket in the hope of one day taking a ride into space. However, following last Friday’s crash, it’s far from clear when, if ever, Virgin Galactic will be in a position to launch its first commercial flight.

[UPDATE] The Journal’s source looks to have been solid – NTSB chairman Christopher Hart said later on Sunday his investigation team had discovered that just prior to the accident, an improper co-pilot command occurred which deployed SpaceShipTwo’s tail surfaces prematurely. Just two seconds later, according to Hart, “we saw disintegration.” Despite the revelation, the chairman insisted there are still “months and months” of work to be done to determine the precise cause of the crash.

[Source: WSJ]

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more