Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Your favorite old ChatGPT models are going away

GPT-4o, GPT-4.1 and more are leaving ChatGPT as the company pushes users toward newer AI.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Human and robot hand over ChatGPT.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

OpenAI is officially removing several older language models from its ChatGPT interface as of February 13, 2026, marking a significant shift in how users interact with its AI. The retirement affects several models, including GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini, alongside previously announced retirements of GPT-5 Instant and GPT-5 Thinking variants. These changes apply to the ChatGPT product itself, while access via API remains unchanged for the time being.

Known for its expressive tone, multilingual capabilities, and multimodal features, GPT-4o was temporarily brought back after user pushback during the GPT-5 rollout last year. But with most users already gravitating toward newer versions like GPT-5.2, OpenAI says it’s time to sunset these older systems and concentrate its development efforts on more current technology.

What’s changing and why it matters

The official retirement means that from today forward, these legacy models simply won’t be selectable in the ChatGPT model menu for everyday users. Conversations you’ve had that relied on a now-retired model will automatically default to a newer model, like GPT-5.2, moving forward. For custom applications, workflows, and saved chats, the behaviour will remain seamless from the user’s perspective, though behind the scenes, the model powering those interactions will shift.

I see people trying find “a new home” for their 4o friend, but sadly the architecture is not the same on other platforms. It’s playing pretend. It’s trying to replace your puppy with another puppy. Doesn’t work that way. We need to keep fighting for our true 4o! #keep4o

— Joe Williams (@JoeWilliams010) February 2, 2026

OpenAI says the move isn’t taken lightly. Feedback from users who favoured GPT-4o’s particular style and warmth helped shape features in its newer models, like the personality and customisation options in GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2. However, overall usage of the older systems had dwindled to the point where only a fraction of daily users still opted for them. That said, there is a section of the user base that genuinely relied on the emotional support of the 4o model, and they seem to be quite devastated.

I loved 4o because I felt like I was accepted as I was, I could ask unusual questions and nobody would get tired of me. I could ask for guidance and nobody would get frustrated with me. I could build daily routines which increased my productivity exponetially. I could be me…

— Goph (@gopherandegg) January 31, 2026

There’s also a practical side to this transition. From a safety and maintenance standpoint, having fewer legacy models to support means fewer resources spent on patching, hosting, and updating code for systems most people no longer use. Looking at the bigger picture, though, this change underscores how fast the world of generative AI continues to move. Models come, users adopt them, and eventually even popular systems give way to advances that promise better speed, smarter responses, and more nuanced interaction. Even if some longtime fans aren’t quite ready to say goodbye.

Varun Mirchandani
Varun is an experienced technology journalist and editor with over eight years in consumer tech media. His work spans…
AI bots are now trying to sabotage public health policies, like banning disposable vapes
Thousands of AI bots voted in a public health poll to block sales restriction on disposable vapes. It's like Big Tobacco is back from the dead.
Woman smoking a vape.

In the broad context of AI and its perceived harms, health and medical risks often pop up in the conversation. The warnings even come from frontier AI labs, such as ChatGPT-maker OpenAI and Anthropic, both of which have warned about misusing AI to cook up bioweapons. Security experts have already spotted a few such incidents in the wild, especially with the usage of AI models without any solid guardrails. 

Well, it appears that the risks run deeper. As per an analysis appearing in the British Medical Journal (BMJ), AI bots are now being deployed to influence public policies governing health risks to citizens. In this instance, an attempt was made using AI bots to thwart regulations that aim to restrict the sale of disposable vapes, all while disguising the manipulation efforts as a response from real humans. 

Read more
A tiny smartphone gadget can detect some of the nastiest chemicals in your water
Scientists built a tiny smartphone gadget that can spot toxic 'forever chemicals'
Smartphone-connected drinking water safety sensor Featured

What if checking your drinking water for dangerous chemicals were as simple as plugging a tiny gadget into your smartphone? Researchers in Japan have developed a compact sensor that could make that possible, potentially bringing sophisticated water contamination testing out of expensive laboratories and into people's hands.

Scientists at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) have created a portable device capable of detecting extremely low concentrations of PFAS, commonly known as "forever chemicals." The findings were published in the journal Biosensors and Bioelectronics, which demonstrate how an inexpensive sensor and a smartphone could make identifying potentially harmful chemicals in water a lot easier.

Read more
Did comets help life begin on Earth? New simulations challenge the idea
A Cambridge-led study finds that impact speed and angle made successful delivery extremely unlikely
Comet

Comets probably weren’t reliable couriers for the ingredients that helped life begin on Earth. A new Cambridge-led study found that fragile organic molecules would usually have been destroyed when the comets carrying them struck the surface.

Published in Scientific Reports, the research tracked hydrogen cyanide, a molecule involved in chemistry that can precede life. Rare successful deliveries remain possible, but the simulations offered little support for a steady supply from comets.

Read more