Canon PowerShot SX600 HS review

While Canon’s PowerShot SX600 HS is an easy-to-use camera with a long 18x zoom, performance and image quality resembles those from a lower-end camera.
While Canon’s PowerShot SX600 HS is an easy-to-use camera with a long 18x zoom, performance and image quality resembles those from a lower-end camera.
While Canon’s PowerShot SX600 HS is an easy-to-use camera with a long 18x zoom, performance and image quality resembles those from a lower-end camera.

Highs

  • Compact, pocket-friendly body
  • 18x optical zoom
  • Easy to operate

Lows

  • Mediocre, noisy images
  • No advanced shooting modes
  • Slow lens zoom

DT Editors' Rating

The Canon PowerShot SX600 HS is a 16-megapixel compact camera that’s easy to pocket, yet packs an 18x optical zoom lens. It’s a lower, more affordable model to the SX700 HS, a larger, bulkier camera but has a 30x lens. Despite sharing a similar form factor and moniker, it turns out that the two are far from alike. In fact, the camera’s performance and image quality puts it closer to its point-and-shoot cousin, the PowerShot 340 HS.

Features and design

The SX600 is the baby brother to the recently reviewed SX700. At a quick glance, the two could be easily mistaken as the same camera. They have a similar shaped body, but the SX600 is much more compact – smaller and thinner at approximately 4.1 x 2.4 x 1 inches, and much lighter at around 6 ounces. Hold both in your hands, and you’ll see and feel the noticeable differences in size and weight. It’s far easier to pocket than its bigger brother.

The SX600’s specs and performance resemble its cousin, the ELPH 340 HS, a camera that failed to impress.

The SX600 has a smaller grip for your fingers on the front, and the flash on top pops up, instead of up and out like the SX700’s. Both models have a non-touch 3-inch LCDs, but the SX600’s is rated only at 461,000, which means it isn’t as bright and we noticed that it doesn’t render colors as well as the SX700. The buttons are arranged slightly differently, and are smaller and less substantial; there’s also no scroll wheel around the four-way navigation buttons that double as display, exposure compensation/Wi-Fi, flash, and macro buttons. Like the SX700, the SX600 has both Wi-Fi and near-field communication (NFC) wireless capabilities.

But a big distinction is the lack of a mode dial. You see, although the SX600 has a long zoom, it’s really a simple automatic point-and-shoot. A mode switch gives you three options: regular mode, Creative Shot (the camera shoots a scene with six different artistic exposures), and a Hybrid Auto mode that creates a short movie from the stills you take. If you want some control over the camera, the only option is a Program mode that lets you adjust ISO, white balance, and exposure compensation; all other modes are automatic (including several scene modes). Because of its simplicity, the SX600 is a no-brainer to operate. It uses the same menu system as the SX700 (and most PowerShot models), which we find tedious to use; however, if you only stick with automatic mode, it shouldn’t be a concern.

The other big differences lie under the hood. The SX600 has a much shorter zoom lens (16x versus 30x; 25-450mm equivalent) with a max aperture of f/3.8-6.9, with optical image stabilization. It has a 16-megapixel, 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor (the SX700 has 16.1 megapixels – not a huge change), but uses the older Digic 4+ image processor. ISO ranges from 100-3,200, and shutter speed tops out at 1/2,000th of a second. The SX600 does capture movies at Full HD 1080, but only at 30p. Based on these specs alone, the SX600 is more in-line with the PowerShot ELPH 340 HS. The 340 HS failed to impress us, so we were already wary about the SX600’s performance before we even took it out. Is it really just an oversized ELPH with a longer zoom? We think so.

The Wi-Fi and NFC functions worked well. Canon has improved Wi-Fi in its cameras, to the point that pairing with a smartphone or connecting to a wireless network is no longer a frustrating chore. We didn’t encounter major issues: the camera found and connected to a Wi-Fi network with ease, as it did with a direct Wi-Fi connection to a smartphone (via Canon’s Camera Window app). If your phone has NFC, like the Samsung Galaxy S5 we used, then pairing the two devices is as simple as tapping the two together. The pairing process is similar to that of the SX700, although we had a much smoother time with the SX600 (both cameras did better than the 340 HS). Once connected, we could review photos, transfer them from camera to phone, and operate the camera remotely. The experience isn’t as rich as Samsung or Sony’s cameras, but it worked well. A button with a smartphone icon leads you to the most-often used wireless connections (a one-time setup is required).

Canon SX600 battery

The SX600 uses a similar battery as the SX700, but has a higher rating (290 shots) probably because it’s a less demanding camera. You should be able to get about two days if it’s casual use, but remember to recharge overnight if you plan to have it on continuously, say during a vacation.

What’s in the box

Like the SX700, Canon has kept the SX600’s packaging simple. Inside you’ll find the camera, battery pack, battery charger, wrist strap, and some basic printed material. For software or the full manual, you’ll need to download them from Canon’s website.

Warranty

Canon includes a one-year limited warranty. Complete details can be found here.

Performance and use

We won’t get too deep into the SX600, because it functions exactly like the ELPH 340, and there’s not much we can add that we haven’t already said before. It’s a camera that’s easy to operate, but if you want some control over the camera, you’re limited to only Program mode. As mentioned, navigating through the menus and sub-menus can be a tedious affair, which makes changing settings a chore. If you’re purely an automatic user, you’ll have no issues using the SX600.

Autofocusing is fairly snappy, and focus tracking worked well. Image quality could be better.

Autofocusing is fairly snappy, and focus tracking worked well when in full auto mode, following a flower as it swayed in the wind. Like the 340, it had a hard time grabbing focus in very low light situations, but that’s to be expected. The SX600 has the same burst mode speed (3.9 frames per second), so it’s not an ideal camera for action. Startup time is good, but zooming is slower than we would have liked. Read more about the 340 in our review, to get a sense of performance with the SX600. But, in short, whereas the SX700 tries to mimic its higher-end PowerShot cousins, the SX600 is in the same league as the ELPH series.

So, if the SX600 is nearly identical to the 340 in specs, usability, and performance, can we expect the same with image quality? Let’s get this out of the way: If you’re sharing on the Web or printing at small sizes, the photos will look fine. You’ll most likely overlook (or not notice) some of the issues like some noise, graininess, dull and fuzzy edges, loss of details, areas where brightness has been overblown (exposure compensation helped somewhat correct those), and muted colors that are noticeable if you view the images in actual size. It’s not the end of the world, but it isn’t great either. The benefit over the 340 is the 18x zoom (versus the 12x), and while it’s nice to be able to see that far, you’re still getting so-so image quality. The optical image stabilization, however, works well. In low light, image quality suffers. Nothing is in focus, and quality gets really noisy at ISO 1,600. Again, you can use them if you’re in a pinch, but don’t bother viewing them in large sizes.

Movie quality is fine with few instances of weird artifacts, albeit picture quality is a bit grainy and not particularly sharp, but at times we had issues with keeping things focused when we zoomed in and out. Again, we did wish the zoom was a bit quicker, and it’s noticeable here. The microphone could also do a better job. It’s not stereo, so sound quality is overly loud boomy (not in the good way). In quiet situations, the microphone will pick up the sound of the lens when zooming.

As we said in our review of the 340, we were a bit disappointed by the image quality, because we’ve always held Canon’s compact cameras in high esteem. We attribute this lackluster performance to the older Digic 4+ image processor. The SX700, which uses the newer Digic 6, offers far better performance, showing how big of a role the image processor plays in a camera.

Conclusion

For $50 more than the ELPH 340 HS, you can get a similar camera with an increased zoom. However, that camera failed to impress us as much as its predecessor, the ELPH 330 HS. So, even though it may have a better lens, for us the SX600 feels nearly identical to the 340, and don’t feel it’s worth the $50 premium. (We still think the 330 offers a better deal in a pocket camera.)

Now, if you can spend $100 more and you’d like to stick with a Canon camera, we recommend buying the SX700. It’s a camera that delivers much better image and video quality, and has various shooting modes and extra features not found in the SX600. It’s larger, heavier, and chunkier, but it’s a better camera for the money.

Highs

  • Compact, pocket-friendly body
  • 18x optical zoom
  • Easy to operate

Lows

  • Mediocre, noisy images
  • No advanced shooting modes
  • Slow lens zoom
Product Review

Equal parts tool and toy, the Lensbaby Edge 35 bucks photographic tradition

The Lensbaby Edge 35, part of the Composer Pro optic swap system, creates tilt-shift-like blur without the tilt-shift price. Made for photographers who want find tradition boring, it opens up new ways to work with blur.
Photography

Panasonic Lumix S1R vs. Nikon Z 7: When megapixels matter, which do you choose?

The 47-megapixels Lumix S1R and 46-megapixel Nikon Z 7 are the two highest-resolution, full-frame mirrorless cameras on the market. The S1R features a high-resolution mode that can take 187MP images, but the Nikon is lighter and cheaper.
Deals

The Canon EOS Rebel T6 DSLR camera gets a steep price cut at Walmart

Modern smartphones can snap pretty impressive pics, but if you want pro-quality photos, you need a dedicated digital camera. The Canon EOS Rebel T6 is one of the best entry-level DSLR cameras on the market, and it’s on sale right now for…
Photography

Nikon Z 7 vs. Sony A7R III: High-res mirrorless cameras compared

The Nikon Z 7 and Sony A7R III both have over 40 megapixels, but which one comes out on top? With similar image quality, the answer comes down to speed, autofocus, battery life, and design.
Photography

Go for bokeh, not for broke with the best cameras under $1,000

Looking for a great camera without spending more than $1,000? From the stellar Fujifilm X-T30 to the beginner-friendly Canon EOS Rebel T7i, here are the best sub-$1,000 cameras on the market right now.
Photography

These are the best camera straps you can get your hands on

Choosing the right camera strap for your needs can be a tough decision. To help sort through the junk, we've rounded up the best camera straps on the market for you to choose from.
Emerging Tech

Awesome Tech You Can’t Buy Yet: Halfbikes, VR for all your senses, and more

Check out our roundup of the best new crowdfunding projects and product announcements that hit the web this week. You may not be able to buy this stuff yet, but it's fun to gawk!
Photography

Fujifilm X-T30 vs. Sony A6400: Midrange mirrorless cameras compared

The Fujifilm X-T30 and Sony A6400 are two of the best cameras you can buy for under $1,000, but which should you choose? Each has an edge in certain situations which makes picking a winner difficult, but here's how they compare.
Photography

Photography news: Sony brings Eye Autofocus to critters via A.I.

In this week's photography news, the Sony a7 III and a7R III have some new capabilities, thanks to updated firmware. Lexar teases a crazy fast 1,000MB/s memory card, while Vimeo launches bulk upload possibilities.
Deals

The best budget-friendly GoPro alternatives that won’t leave you broke

Cold weather is here, and a good action camera is the perfect way to record all your adventures. You don't need to shell out the big bucks for a GoPro: Check out these great GoPro alternatives, including some 4K cameras, that won’t leave…
Photography

Etch-A-Snap camera puts a modern spin on one of your favorite childhood toys

Can't draw on an Etch A Sketch? Snap a photo with the Etch-A-Snap and the camera will draw out the scene for you. The weirdly cool camera designed by Martin Fitzpatrick replaces the usual LCD screen with an old-school Etch A Sketch.
Photography

The Black Eye Pro Cinema Wide G4 is a knockout lens for any smartphone

Where cheaper wide-angle accessory lenses add distortion, and costlier models don't always justify their higher prices, the Black Eye Pro Cinema Wide G4 offers a valuable balance of modest price and high quality optics.
Photography

Family feud: Huawei P30 Pro vs. P20 Pro vs. Mate 20 Pro camera shootout

The Huawei P30 Pro's camera has an amazing zoom mode and low light capabilities. But take these away, and how does it compare when facing its sibling phones, the P20 Pro and Mate 20 Pro, taking regular photos?
Photography

Sweet 16: Wacom’s Cintiq 16 pen display makes retouching photos a breeze

Wacom’s Cintiq pen displays are usually reserved for the pros (or wealthy enthusiasts), but the new Cintiq 16 brings screen and stylus editing to an approachable price. Does it cut too much to get there?