Skip to main content

New Call of Duty: Warzone mode is the change the game needs

Call of Duty: Warzone separates itself from other battle royale games in more ways than one. Whether it’s giving players the ability to use their own custom loadouts, offering a way to come back from the dead via the Gulag, or even its general overall feel, there isn’t anything quite like it.

Arguably, its most controversial aspect is the fact that Warzone features an extremely fast time to kill (TTK), which causes gunfights to be over before you even realize you’re being attacked. However, a recent update implemented the Iron Trials mode on Rebirth Island, giving players more health and, ultimately, more time to react — but on a smaller map, resulting in faster-paced matches.

Rebirth Island was already a beloved map, but now that Iron Trials has been added to it, the entire dynamic of the game has changed for the better.

Recommended reading

More time to react

Iron Trials was previously featured during a limited-time event in 2021. It was only available on Verdansk, though, so matches were still long and slow-paced for the majority of their duration. This mode gives players a base health amount of 250 (aside from additional health granted from armor), more expensive Buy Station prices, no free Loadout Drops, and faster round timers overall. This results in matches with higher stakes, especially since respawns are disabled, while retaining the fast-paced flow players love on Rebirth Island.

It’s a fascinating balance because, on one hand, players are encouraged to play more cautiously since money is harder to come by and items are more expensive. You don’t want to lose your hard-earned cash several minutes into a match. But on the other hand, having more health means you can take more risks. An enemy you might not feel comfortable challenging during a normal match might be worth engaging with during Iron Trials since you have more wiggle room during the battle. Beyond that, items are scarce, meaning your opponent might not have full shields at the start of an engagement anyway.

Iron Trials works because it rewards players who are more consistent and accurate, rather than a player who happened to get lucky.

During a firefight, you can make minor adjustments to deal more damage, turning the odds in your favor, even if the engagement didn’t start as well as you’d hoped. There were countless times when an enemy would start firing at me first, but thanks to accurate aim, I was able to snap onto the opponent’s head and deal as much damage as possible while bobbing and weaving around, which kept me out of their line of sight. Winning gunfights in this manner is more satisfying than you’d expect, because it rarely comes down to luck.

Emphasis on variation

Players landing on Rebirth Island in Warzone.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Another positive factor has to do with weapon variety that results from a slower TTK. This means weapons with higher magazine counts — such as heavy assault rifles or LMGs — are bumped up to the top of the meta, giving the game a totally different dynamic. Typically, lightweight SMGs or snipers are some of the most used weapon types, pushing heavier weapons with more ammo to the back of the line. While SMGs and snipers do make for a faster-paced match, there isn’t much variety when nearly everyone in the lobby is using these kinds of weapons during standard battle royale.

In Iron Trials, you can still use the aforementioned lightweight weapons, but far more players will bring out the big guns since you need more bullets to secure an elimination. It rewards super-accurate players who can make every last bullet in a small clip SMG count, while still giving LMG users a chance. Accurate players can get away with using weapons with lower mag counts, and they’re rewarded by being much more nimble on their feet. You’ll rarely get taken out with the same meta weapons over and over again=.

Reward for planning

Aside from offering variety, more health also means ammo is precious. You’re less likely to go in and wipe out an entire team by yourself during Iron Trials. It’s not completely off the table, but it’s much harder to do since running out of ammo is far more common. While playing, I won several gunfights against opponents who simply ran out of ammo in the middle of the fight, giving me a chance to retaliate and come out on top.

It pays to have a full clip at the beginning of the gunfight and it’s equally as important to maximize your movement so you can avoid taking damage — hopefully causing your opponent to run out of bullets. Having to approach situations more cautiously, especially ones that involve multiple enemies at once, makes each engagement play out in a more deliberate manner, rather than fast and sporadic. Sure, it feels great to run in and take out an entire team by yourself, but you need to be much more skilled this time around if that’s what you want to do.

In the clip above, you can see that my gun skill wasn’t particularly impressive, but because I backed away and reloaded, I was able to take out both opponents simply because I thought ahead. In a regular Rebirth Island match, the second enemy could have taken me out due to seeing me first, but because ammo is so much more precious, and accurate aim is far more important, I was able to come out on top.

Warzone 2 (or whatever it will be called) is in development, and while there’s no shortage of features we’d like to see implemented, giving players more health is at the top of the list. The positive reception to Iron Trials should be proof of that. It’s no fun to spend an entire match looting and getting prepared, only to get sniped by someone off in the distance who happened to be looking in your direction. Having more health gives players time to react, rewarding them for thinking on their feet.

Editors' Recommendations

Joseph Yaden
Joseph Yaden is a freelance journalist who covers Nintendo, shooters, and horror games. He mostly covers game guides for…
You’re probably using the wrong close-range Warzone weapon
Call of Duty Warzone screenshot of 3 characters walking towards the camera.

Following the Call of Duty: Warzone Season 4 Reloaded update, players have flocked to various close-range weapons, including the Lachmann Sub, the FSS Hurricane, or the ISO 45. However, these close-range weapons pale in comparison to the X13 Auto, a sidearm that has found its way to the top of the close-range meta.

The beauty of this weapon is that, not only does it take down your foes faster than any SMG in the game, but it also doesn't require the use of the Overkill perk, as it's just a sidearm. But how exactly should you build the X13 Auto? Here's a recommended loadout, which focuses on practicality up-close. Just use it while you still can, as it may not last long.
The best X13 Auto loadout

Read more
Vondel is the best Call of Duty: Warzone map ever and it’s not even close
Characters on the Vondel map in Warzone.

Since Call of Duty: Warzone's release in 2020, Activision has released a number of battle royale maps -- some of which have captivated a large audience. Think Verdansk, Rebirth Island, and Fortune's Keep. Though, with the new version of Warzone (formerly referred to as Warzone 2.0), the maps haven't garnered the same positive buzz ... until now.

Alongside the release of Season 4, Activision released the new Vondel map, which takes place in an urban Netherlands city, full of various buildings, a canal, and even a public transit system (via ground or water). Vondel isn't just great, it's the best Warzone map ever made.
What is Vondel?

Read more
FTC v. Microsoft: 5 surprising revelations from the court hearing that you need to know
Call of Duty Warzone screenshot of 3 characters walking towards the camera.

We have reached an inflection point in Microsoft’s efforts to acquire Call of Duty and World of Warcraft publisher Activision Blizzard as the FTC’s lawsuit to stop it went before a judge. Representatives from Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Google, and Nvidia chimed in during the hearing, as did a variety of analysts presenting data to help determine whether or not this acquisition will hurt competition in the console and cloud gaming markets.
As the video game industry is quite buttoned-up and secretive, this trial has given us an unprecedented look behind the curtain at Xbox, PlayStation, and Activision’s motivations, past claims and mistakes they made, and more. In a case filled with revelations, these five details were a particularly illuminating look into the video game industry's inner workings.
Microsoft revealed its real cloud gaming motivation

Since 2019, Microsoft has been one of the video game industry’s biggest purveyors of cloud gaming alongside the likes of Nvidia, Amazon, and Google. It previously claimed that its primary goal with this was to get its hardcore games like Halo in front of as many people as possible, but this trial has revealed a secondary motivation. Microsoft hoped cloud gaming would give them an edge in the mobile gaming market, where Xbox has struggled to establish itself.
“We built xCloud knowing that on Xbox we have many games that run on our console,” Head of Xbox Phil Spencer explained. “There are many users around the world that have phones that aren’t able to play those games, nor will they be. Our strategy was to put consoles in our data centers to stream those consoles to a mobile phone, so if someone wanted to play Halo on a mobile phone, they would have access to those games through streaming.
It didn’t work out that way, though. Xbox’s VP of Game Creator Experience, Sarah Bond, testified that the most common use for cloud gaming is not mobile play but console players trying out a game before or during a download. Because cloud gaming is a sticking point for the CMA, Microsoft wants to downplay its relevancy to Xbox’s business, but, as I wrote in April, it might be too late for them to do that. Even if cloud gaming’s future is as a supplementary service on consoles, it’s sticking around as one of the central aspects of dissent against the acquisition. The future of cloud gaming is just playing out in a way no one predicted when it re-rose to prominence four years ago.
Activision regrets not putting Call of Duty on Nintendo Switch

Read more