Skip to main content

Nickelodeon breaks out of cable’s cage, preps standalone streaming service

Nickelodeon, which serves as home to popular kid’s shows like iCarly and SpongeBob SquarePants, is following the lead of networks like HBO and CBS – though for a very different audience – with plans to launch its own subscription video service, reports Variety.

The service would give parents the opportunity to access tons of children’s programming for a small, yet-to-be-confirmed fee without needing a cable or satellite TV subscription. That’s a huge leap of faith for parent company Viacom, but perhaps a very smart decision. Children’s programming is one of the most popular genres among cord-cutters, and one that competitive video streaming services like Netflix and Amazon focus heavily on. Get ‘em young when it comes to the new TV, it seems.

Recommended Videos

Related: From HBO to CBS, the dream of a la carte TV is coming true one stream at a time

And it makes sense – anyone who has kids knows that a toddler isn’t going to happily sit through a one-minute commercial break every few minutes – standard practice on regular network television. And while they are growing up pretty tech-savvy, most kids either don’t know how to skip through commercials, or don’t understand the very concept of having to do so. On-demand is the way to go with the young’uns.

Interestingly, Nickelodeon will reportedly be focusing mainly on the mobile side – presumably for parents who are looking to entertain their kids while out and about using a smartphone or tablet. Though there’s no reason the content wouldn’t be just as easily accessible on a computer or large screen TV.

That said, more details, including a name for the service and what programming will be made available there, are to be revealed next month.

This new business model is promising for those who have been craving TV packages that are more customized. But one must wonder if the better option would be to partner up with a Netflix or Hulu or Amazon and let these guys take care of the on demand needs. Sure, the more a la carte options customers have, the better. But at some point, those costs will add up and customers will come full circle, looking once again for a one-stop-shop solution that’s tailored to them, and offers exactly the channels they want. Surely, the industry can meet somewhere in the middle.

Christine Persaud
Christine has decades of experience in trade and consumer journalism. While she started her career writing exclusively about…
These live TV streaming deals make now a great time to cut the cable cord
Watching Hulu on TV for national streaming day with remote in foreground.

While choosing one or two streaming services to pay for can be quite a daunting task these days, because there are just so many, if you want to watch live TV online, that narrows the playing field. Most services focus on providing on-demand shows and movies or original content in a binge-worthy format. But what if you just want to tune in to some live MSNBC or CBS broadcasts? What about live sports? You can still have that with online streaming, or more specifically, live TV streaming services like Fubo, Sling TV, and YouTube TV. If you want to check those out and capitalize on some fantastic live TV streaming deals, you've found the right place.
The best live TV streaming deals to cut the cord
DirecTV Stream

DirecTV Stream is the brand's live TV offering which combines live TV and streaming apps, all in one place. With it, you get access to over 75 live channels, including over 30 regional sports networks, unlimited cloud DVR storage, and you can stream on an unlimited number of devices in your home. Starting at $80 per month for the base plan, there is a free trial available, so you can stream for up to five-days without paying a dime. After that, you can grab the middle tier plan at $84 per month -- normally $109 -- which increases access to 105 channels, primarily specialty sports networks like Big Ten, MLB, NBA, and ACC.

Read more
Why you can ignore those ‘streaming vs. cable price’ stories
App icons on the Apple TV homescreen.

There’s been a rash of stories of late that declare “streaming” (I’ll explain the quotes shortly) dead because it costs more than cable. You can ignore those stories. And there’s been a bevy of stories in response debunking those stories because contrarianism is sexy, and because bad facts deserve to be called out. But you can ignore those stories, too.

None of them matters. First, because lumping all “streaming” (this is where the quotes come in) into the same bunch is lazy and dumb. All video is “streaming.” If you watch Netflix, you’re “streaming.” If you watch YouTube TV or Sling — or any of the newfangled free streaming services — you’re “streaming.” If you rent a movie from iTunes or Amazon or Google or wherever, you’re “streaming.” Digital bits make their way into your home and are decoded by a little electronic doodad and then presented on your TV or computer or phone. By the way, “cable” also takes digital bits and feeds them into your home before decoding them with a little electronic doodad (often doing so with a far inferior user experience), just in a somewhat different manner, insofar as the bits and bytes are concerned. So we’re sort of splitting hairs here.

Read more
4K video will cost more on the new Max streaming service
Max streaming service logo.

The new Max streaming service — that is, the combined HBO Max and Discovery+ — is now official and will be available starting May 23. And with it comes a plethora of new series and shows. And execs made a big deal about pricing, and that it'll be the same as the existing price of HBO Max.

But that wasn't entirely true.

Read more