Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Suit Up: Skype’s Founders Sue eBay for Copyright Infringement

Add as a preferred source on Google

Skype FoundersThe legal tussle between Skype founders Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis and online auction house eBay looks like it’s going to turn into a shooting war: Skype’s founders, via their company Joltid, have filed an infringement suit in the Northern California U.S. District Court accusing eBay and a group of its investors of infringing on Joltid’s intellectual property on a massive scale through continued operation of Skype services. Joltid wants an injunction that would prevent eBay from using Joltid’s intellectual property, as well as damages that Joltid “reasonably” believes could amount to $75 million per day.

The case centers around the core peer-to-peer networking technology at the heart of Skype: when eBay acquired Skype in 2006 for $2.6 billion, it somehow left the crown jewels on the table: Skype founders Friis and Zennstrom retained the rights to Global Index Software, the peer-to-peer software underneath Skype, and merely licensed it to eBay. As eBay has increasingly soured on the Skype deal—and recently announced an agreement to sell off a majority stake in the VoIP operation—Joltid announced it was terminating the license agreement with eBay because, Joltid claims, eBay obtained and modified source code without Joltid’s authorization, and disclosed the technology to third parties. For its part, eBay denies that it has violated its license agreement with Joltid, and furthermore is working on its own software to replace Joltid’s peer-to-peer technology.

Recommended Videos

The case mirrors similar litigation underway in the United Kingdom; however, that suit isn’t scheduled to go to trial until mid-2010. Joltid’s U.S. lawsuit targets both eBay and the group of investors set to purchase the majority share in Skype, and may be a serious complication to the deal.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more