Skip to main content

FCC really doesn’t like phone jammers, seeks $48K fine for driver caught using device (updated)

Updated on 05-01-2014 by Williams Pelegrin: Added MetroPCS complaint and how the emissions were found.

Florida resident Jason Humphreys may have thought he was doing a good deed by using a cell phone jammer in his vehicle to prevent other drivers using their handsets behind the wheel, but the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) certainly doesn’t see it that way.

Recommended Videos

In an FCC document released Tuesday, the government agency revealed it’s hit Humphreys with a sizable $48,000 fine for the apparent use of a cell phone jammer. According to the document, Humphreys used the device on his daily commute for up to two years along a section of Interstate 4 between Seffner and Tampa, causing disruption to not only regular drivers using handsets but also to police and other emergency response teams.

“Due to the nature and extended duration of Mr. Humphreys’ violations, we take an aggressive approach and propose the per violation statutory maximum of $16,000 for each of the offenses – unauthorized operation, use of an illegal device, and causing intentional interference,” the FCC said in the document.

The interference caught the eye of MetroPCS, which then reported the issue last April. According to the company, its cell phone tower sites were experiencing interference during morning and evening commutes. As a result, FCC agents were able to find the source of the strong wideband emissions, Humphreys’ blue Toyota Highlander, using direction finding techniques.

When stopped by cops last year, Humphreys reportedly said he’d been using a jammer to stop other vehicle owners from using their handset while behind the wheel, despite there currently being no law in Florida against talking on a cell phone while driving, though texting is prohibited.

The agency described the use of jammers as “generally unlawful,” adding that the device “can endanger life and property by preventing individuals from making 911 or other emergency calls or disrupting communications essential to aviation and marine safety.” In the US, jammers are banned for private use, though federal officials are permitted to use them in some cases.

The FCC also recently issued a fine of $29,000 to a company in Texas, which had reportedly installed a jammer to prevent its employees from using their handsets at work, while last year a New Jersey truck driver was ordered to pay a similarly hefty $32,000 for an offense involving the device. As for Humphreys, he has 30 days to either pay the $48,000 or file a written response requesting a reduction or cancellation of the fine.

What do you say? Whack those caught using jammers with big fines, or allow for their use in special circumstances?

[Via The Register] [Image: Syda Productions / Shutterstock]

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Samsung reveals upcoming Galaxy Watch 8 features as it looks to improve your health
Here are four new features coming to the next Galaxy Watch
A person wearing the 40mm Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 using apps.

If you've been looking forward to the follow-up of the Galaxy Watch 7 then good news, as Samsung has revealed some of the new features coming to its next generation smartwatch.

Expected to be called the Samsung Galaxy Watch 8, the South Korean firm has published a post on its site detailing new features for "the upcoming Galaxy Watch".

Read more
Forget Pro Max iPhones and Ultra Samsungs, the best phone I’ve used in years is the humble Pixel 9
Person holding the Google Pixel 9.

A few weeks ago, I returned to my Google Pixel 9 to test Gemini’s next-gen AI features. It was hard letting go of the OnePlus 13,  arguably one of the most rewarding phones out there. Plus, given the “Pixel history,” I had prepared myself for a bumpy ride, just like the Pixel 8, and the Pixel 7 before it. 

To my surprise, the Pixel 9 fared a lot better. It feels snappier on Android 16, takes sharp pictures, and lasts all day easily. The only thing pulling it down? The sporadic bad apps and updates. It's not enough to consider a replacement, but it's certainly frustrating in bits and pieces. 

Read more
Want smart glasses? The Meta Ray-Ban Glasses are 20% off today
The front of the Ray-Ban Meta smartglasses.

If you've always been interested in smart glasses, you should take advantage of Amazon's offer for the Headliner style of the Meta Ray-Ban Glasses. From their original price of $329, they're on sale for a more affordable $263 following a 20% discount from the retailer. This is a limited-time deal though, so you may miss out on the savings of $66 if you take too long to think about it. We highly recommend proceeding with the transaction as soon as possible, as once this bargain is gone, we're not sure when you'll get another chance at it.

Why you should buy the Meta Ray-Ban Glasses

Read more