Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. News

Samsung’s big Galaxy Ring bet already seems to be paying off

Add as a preferred source on Google
The gold Samsung Galaxy Ring.
Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Samsung may have an early hit on its hands if production estimates about the new Galaxy Ring are accurate. A report claims Samsung has more than doubled its initial production run of the smart ring, taking it to a million units. This gives us insight into the early interest in Samsung’s first smart ring, and also in the general attitude toward the relatively new type of wearable.

According to The Elec, Samsung intended to produce 400,000 Galaxy Rings at first and then examine performance and demand before deciding whether to increase this number. An unidentified source told the publication that Samsung has now increased this by an extra 600,000 rings, which indicates Samsung has seen far higher demand than initially expected for its very first smart ring.

Recommended Videos

In an earlier report from The Elec, it was stated that Samsung was able to take this approach to manufacturing the Galaxy Ring due to the product’s small size, and an abundance of the key parts used in production. The initial 400,000 quantity was viewed as being a sizable commitment, making the increase in production even more notable.

If Samsung can get all 1 million Galaxy Rings on to the fingers of eager buyers in 2024, then it will have already come close to matching the total sales of the Oura Ring since the very first version. In a recent interview with CNBC, Oura said it has sold “more than a million” smart rings since launch, a date which may go back as far as 2015 when its first smart ring arrived on Kickstarter. However, Oura repeated the same approximate sales figure in 2022, so the exact number is unknown.

The Galaxy Ring has already impressed us, and although it has a high initial cost, Samsung has not added a subscription fee to access data in the app. It’s a big advantage over the Oura Ring, and is likely to play a major part in adoption. Samsung’s big smart ring bet, and the lack of a subscription tied to it, certainly seems to be paying off in these early stages.

Andy Boxall
Andy has written about mobile technology for almost a decade. From 2G to 5G and smartphone to smartwatch, Andy knows tech.
TSMC might set up a price hike that could come straight for your next phone, laptop, or tablet
Here's what TSMC's rumored 10% chip price increase actually means in dollar terms, and why your next phone or laptop could end up costing more.
TSMC Fab

My wallet flinched the second I saw the words "TSMC" and "price increase" in the same headline, and honestly, yours should too.

Turns out the company behind the silicon powering basically every flagship device out there, including Apple’s A-series and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon processors, is reportedly about to make all of it a little pricier.

Read more
Samsung’s free storage doubling for preorders is gone in Austria, and the replacement isn’t as sweet
Samsung's free storage doubling deal might just be history.
The back of the Galaxy Z Fold 7

If you've pre-ordered a Samsung foldable purely for the free storage bump, tomorrow's Unpacked event might sting a little.

For years, pre-ordering a new Galaxy meant automatically getting double the storage at no additional charge. Buy the 128GB model, walk away with 256GB for the same price. The same applied to the 256GB and 512GB models. However, that might change at the upcoming Galaxy Unpacked event. 

Read more
Apple fixes Hide My Email bug that exposed users’ real email addresses
Here's how Apple's Hide My Email flaw leaked real addresses for over a year, and why it only got fixed once the story went public.
apple-merging-sign-in-with-apple-hide-my-email-icloud+

Turns out the "Hide" part of Hide My Email wasn't doing its job quite as advertised, something that I covered early in July. Security researcher Tyler Murphy reported the flaw in June 2025, but despite Apple claiming it was resolved in March 2026, independent tests confirmed it remained exploitable, at least until July 3, 2026.

So how did this bug actually work?

Read more