Skip to main content

Lyft also threatens to shut down California operations over worker law

Less than 24 hours after Uber threatened it would shut down its California operations over a new law that requires the company to classify drivers as employees, Lyft followed suit, saying that it would be forced to “suspend operations” in the state if the law isn’t reversed.

In an earnings call Wednesday night, August 12, Lyft president John Zimmer said: “If our efforts here are not successful it would force us to suspend operations in California. Fortunately, California voters can make their voices heard by voting yes on Prop 22 in November.”

Digital Trends reached out to Lyft for comment. We will update this story when we hear back.

Proposition 22 in California would effectively repeal Assembly Bill 5, voted into law last September, which extends employee classification to gig workers. As it stands now, all Lyft and Uber drivers are given independent contractor classification, where they essentially work as freelancers for the company and can pick and choose their own schedules. California harbors one of the largest pools of gig economy workers.

Labor advocates say the AB5 classification will allow California’s gig workers to obtain more traditional perks of full-time employment, like health insurance and workers’ compensation. Right now, no Lyft or Uber drivers are given these benefits.

On Monday, a preliminary injunction was granted to Uber and Lyft to appeal the classification of their drivers by next week after a judge ruled that the companies must make their drivers full-time employees.

Both ride-hailing services, as well as food delivery service DoorDash, have thrown millions of dollars into supporting Prop 22 — the industry’s last-ditch effort to repeal AB5 if any legal challenges during the temporary injunction fail in the courts.

On Wednesday, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi threatened to shut down its operations in California if the classification was to move forward for “several months.” Both Uber and Lyft have been vocal about their opposition to the bill, and said each operation would not be able to afford to treat their massive pool of drivers as employees.

Editors' Recommendations

Meira Gebel
Meira Gebel is a freelance reporter based in Portland. She writes about tech, social media, and internet culture for Digital…
Lyft gets green light to put self-driving cars on California roads
lyft settlement judge denied ride share app

The already-crowded streets of California are going to get a bit busier, now that the state granted another self-driving permit. Lyft joins a growing list of companies that have the green light to test autonomous automobile technology on the West Coast; others include fellow ride-hailing service Uber, Alphabet-backed Waymo (which already has self-driving taxis out and about), and automakers like Mercedes-Benz, Tesla, and Ford.

Lyft's newly approved status can be viewed on the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) website, which notes that it is "currently accepting applications for the Autonomous Vehicle Tester Program." The first company to gain approval was Volkswagen, but since then, more than 40 other firms have been granted the same privilege.

Read more
U.K.'s updated Drug Enforcement law lets police shut down some phones
uk drug enforcement phone shutdown smartune antenna tuners

Amendments to the U.K.'s Digital Economy Act let authorities disable smartphones if they're suspected of being involved in illegal activity. That's according to International Business Times, which reports that changes enacted this month give U.K. police the power to restrict the communications of drug suspects -- even when there's no conclusive proof they've committed a crime.

"This is an entirely unprecedented and potentially draconian power allowing police to prevent the use of phone and other communications devices, whether or not an offense is committed," Myles Jackman, legal director at Open Rights Group, told IB Times UK.

Read more
Lyft and Uber spending big bucks to overturn Texas fingerprint law
lyft too nice follows rules presskit 04

Uber and Lyft share plenty interest in a vote being held today in Austin, Texas. The two companies have been the major contributors to lobby group Ridesharing Works for Austin, according to Reuters. The group is focused on overturning an Austin municipal law passed in December, 2015 that requires fingerprinting in background checks of ride-hail service drivers.

According to campaign records, Ridesharing Works for Austin spent $5.4 million of its $8 million in contributions by the end of April. The group lobbying in favor of keeping the law in place, in contrast, spent just $83,000 of the $100,000 it had raised.

Read more