Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. Legacy Archives

Verizon tells FCC that data throttling is necessary to keep the network going

Add as a preferred source on Google

A week ago, Verizon announced that it will throttle the data of users on its unlimited plan. The company claimed that the new policy would affect less than 20 percent of its subscribers and improve the overall speed of the network, especially in areas where severe data congestion exists. Shortly thereafter, Tom Wheeler, the head of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) sent Verizon a letter asking the carrier to explain why only those on its unlimited data plans will be throttled.

” ‘Reasonable network management’ concerns the technical management of your network; it is not a loophole designed to enhance your revenue streams,” Wheeler wrote in his letter to Verizon Wireless President and CEO Daniel Mead. “It is disturbing to me that Verizon Wireless would base its ‘network management’ on distinctions among its consumers’ data plans, rather than on network architecture or technology.”

Recommended Videos

Verizon has been very successful at convincing customers to abandon their unlimited data plans and buy smaller, capped amounts of shared data.

In response, Verizon issued the following statement on its website: “As we’ve said, what we announced last week was a highly targeted and very limited network optimization effort, only targeting cell sites experiencing high demand. The purpose is to ensure there is capacity for everyone in those limited circumstances, and that high users don’t limit capacity for others.”

Verizon claims that congestion on its network is to blame for the addition of unlimited data plan subscribers to its list of people whose data speeds may be throttled after they exceed the 4.7GB threshold. It says that throttling is a necessary evil, which will ensure that its network runs smoothly for all its subscribers at all times.

What’s somewhat suspect about Verizon’s statement is that unlimited data subscribers are few and far between. Recent studies have shown that Verizon has been one of the most successful carriers at convincing customers to abandon their unlimited data plans and buy smaller, capped amounts of shared data. Verizon itself has said that the vast majority of its customers are now on limited, shared data plans. So why would the carrier need to throttle the few remaining unlimited data customers it has left? Wouldn’t it make more sense to throttle the shared data plan subscribers who use 4.7GB+ a month, too?

In the past few months, Verizon has slowly but surely enticed unlimited customers to join capped data plans by offering great promotions for those plans and snubbing the unlimited users. For example, capped data plan users receive the $5 NFL Mobile app for free, but unlimited users got nothing. Verizon has also given unlimited subscribers special offers on handset upgrades and other cool things if only they switch to the company’s capped data plans.

Although Verizon claims that it just wants to get users off the unlimited data plans because they no longer offer the service to new customers and these users are congesting the network, a recent report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) demonstrated that capped data plans don’t help decongest the network, they just make people pay more for data.

Additionally, users with a limited amount of data can be charged overages. Those on unlimited plans cannot. Verizon charges $15 for each gigabyte of data that users go over their allotment each month. Given that Verizon has some of the most expensive family plans available, mainly due to high data prices, many families opt for small amounts of data and then get slammed with overage charges. Fear of overage charges has reportedly inspired some users to buy more data than they actually need, which also adds to Verizon’s profits.

Malarie Gokey
As DT's Mobile Editor, Malarie runs the Mobile and Wearables sections, which cover smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, and…
Pixel 11 Pro XL vs. Galaxy S26 Ultra: Do you want smarter AI or more powerful hardware?
Two flagships, two philosophies, and one very difficult choice.
Electronics, Phone, Mobile Phone

Google and Samsung aren’t just creating flagship smartphones. They’re building different philosophies for what “flagship” means, how “smart” a smartphone should actually be, and what cost you should pay for a top-tier experience. That would be the major theme in this comparison between the newly-launched Pixel 11 Pro XL, which goes on sale from August 20, 2026, and Samsung’s Galaxy S26 Ultra, which is already available in the market. 

While Google’s new software and AI-based features seem all about killing third-party apps for specific use cases, the Galaxy S26 Ultra leans into raw hardware power and productivity tools to assert its dominance. The reason to choose one, in my opinion, has nothing to do with the difference in the specifications, and everything to do with the type of flagship experience you value more. 

Read more
I am a Google Pixel owner, and I am tired of being an unpaid QA tester
Google Pixel 10 Pro in the official silicon case

Unboxing a flagship smartphone used to feel like a solved equation. You paid top dollar, handed over your credit card, and received a fully baked piece of hardware capable of navigating basic daily life without a thermal meltdown.

Last month, standing under direct sunlight in 45-degree weather, my partner held her $1,000 Pixel 10 Pro up to my car's air conditioning vent just so Google Maps wouldn't shut down mid-route. It wasn't rendering 3D ray-traced graphics or exporting 8K video. I was simply following GPS directions while listening to a podcast - a routine task my three-year-old iPhone 15 handled without breaking a sweat. Rest assured, Google Maps did take us to the wrong address in the end.

Read more
Pixel 11 vs Pixel 10 series: Do Google’s new phones offer enough for an upgrade?
I compared the Pixel 11 series to the Pixel 10, and here's what you should know before buying
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Google’s Pixel 11 family is here, and on paper, it fixes several things I wanted to see improved from the Pixel 10 generation. Tensor G6 promises a meaningful performance bump on all four models, while Google has upgraded cameras throughout the lineup, along with faster charging, and the Pro models get brighter and tougher displays. The Pixel 11 Pro Fold also undergoes much-needed design refinements.

These are some solid improvements for an annual update to Google's flagship lineup. But whether they justify replacing a Pixel 10 you bought a year ago is a different question. Having covered and used enough annual smartphone refreshes over the years, here's who should actually make the upgrade.

Read more