Skip to main content

Social media has spoken and it’s not happy about Ben Affleck as Batman

social media has spoken and its talking trash about ben affleck as batman

The casting of superhero movies is often fraught; fans have very specific visions for their ideal Bruce Banner or Superman, and when someone doesn’t meet their expectations, you’re going to hear about it. 

Screen Shot 2013-08-23 at 4.30.49 PMAnd when someone as famous – and famously divisive – as Ben Affleck gets cast as a superhero as iconic as Batman, there’s no way people aren’t going to lose their minds. Social analytics service Topsy looked at the explosion of tweets surrounding the announcement – there were well over a million about the casting choice within a few hours. And most of them were negative.

Related Videos

While Affleck made an impressive career recovery as a respected director over the past few years, snagging an Oscar for Argo and doing his best to erase our collective memory of Gigli, some people haven’t forgotten this side of the actor: 

Screen Shot 2013-08-23 at 4.19.05 PM

As it turns out, no matter how much critical acclaim you amass, it’s really hard to erase the image of slathering oil on your pop star girlfriend’s body in a crappy music video. This is all to say that people are quite displeased  that Affleck will play Batman in the upcoming sequel to Man of Steel.

The amount of shade thrown on Twitter was… prolific. 

We could easily embed about 20,000 tweets that echo the “Batfleck sucks” sentiment but a bunch of other websites already did that, so we’ll spare you. Some people with very misplaced prioritizes even decided to petition the White House about this casting decision. Because that’s really what they should be focusing on.

Screen Shot 2013-08-23 at 4.45.59 PMBut to get into some more interesting social stats, Topsy tracked the explosion of negative sentiment and contrasted this reaction to the generally positive reception that Tom Hardy got when his role as Bane was announced for The Dark Knight Rises.

People responded enthusiastically about Hardy, and most of their tweets showed positive sentiment – this is to say they thought he was a good choice for a role. 

The announcement of Affleck caused a sharp decrease in positive sentiments tweeted about the actor, although things are leveling out (perhaps because people are realizing that it’s crazy to get up in arms about an actor portraying a superhero before he gets a chance to actually do so… or maybe they’re remembering that plenty of people were angry about the casting of Heath Ledger as the Joker and now that’s considered one of, if not the all-time best superhero acting job). 

Screen Shot 2013-08-23 at 4.43.15 PMWhat does this teach us? People tend to freak out over stuff on Twitter. And Ben Affleck should probably stay away from the Internet for the next few days. 

Editors' Recommendations

The gold iPhone has started a social media civil war
apple goes for gold in its first tv ad iphone 5s side

After yesterday's iPhone announcements, there's really only one question left to ask:
Do you want a gold iPhone - or do you want to smash a gold iPhone?
Just like that, Apple turned us into a people divided - the gold iPhone wanters and the gold iPhone haters. Does a gold iPhone put you in the same class as ItsLavishBitch? Or is it just a little, innocent bling? The jury is out and fighting about it on Twitter and Facebook, naturally. 
Facebook hashtaggers (all seven of you out there!) are generally excited about the lavish iPhone:

Post by Stephanie Fusco.

Read more
It’s time to dust the cobwebs and drunk college pics off your social media profiles
cleaning social media profiles

Admit it: you have, from time to time, glanced at your own profile. I don’t care what social network you frequent – whether you’re a tweet addict or spend your life on Facebook, whether you Instagram every part of your day or Tumblr down the rabbit hole into Internet oblivion, you have definitely clicked on your own profile icon and taken a peek.
There’s no shame in it. It is almost exactly like looking in a mirror  … except it would be really weird if you were sitting on your couch or at your desk engaging in normal life activities like watching TV, working, talking to friends, or eating while staring at yourself in a hand mirror. But that’s what we do with the Internet, just go about our lives while staring into a self-portrait.
This heightened self-awareness (maybe just self-association, I’d argue some of us are less aware thanks to social media) should mean from time to time your mind is varying degrees of boggled at the sheer amount of personal information and content you’ve amassed. If you could physically make a pile of all the things you’ve posted and uploaded, it would probably be embarrassing.
That’s the beauty and bane of digital: It’s all easily collected, but … it’s all easily collected. And this means that like the attic full of memories and mementos, sometimes you have to clean out the junk – starting with the big three: Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Facebook is arguably the easiest and most necessarily social profile for you to dig through. While you probably pouted or raged about the Timeline, it’s year toggle on the sidebar means it’s incredibly simple to go backward in time and clean things up.
Of course, this means it’s also really easy for other people to check out what you were doing in 2003 … so there’s much impetus to get thee to a Timeline and get things in order.
So how do you decide what stays and what goes? A few questions you should ask yourself about the unearthed posts you’re about to find?

Are you still friends with the person that posted it? I don’t know about you, but inane questions and comments from my high school boyfriend don’t really make the cut.
Do those jokes make sense anymore, or do they now sound vaguely threatening? Anything that was halfway funny that one night when you were convinced someone in the library was following you and your friends just sounds creepy now.
Are the photos you uploaded years ago such bad quality you’re embarrassed? In many cases, yes. If the memories are good ones, then keep. A few examples of what you can absolutely delete. 
No idea whose backside that is plus thumb blur? Gone.

Read more
How social media has changed what it means to be a celebrity
smartphone paparazzi

Even in the 1990s, the line between fame and obscurity was easy to find - this was before the advent of Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian, when you were generally famous for being an actor or a sports star, a politician or a pundit. There were many paths to renown, but they all involved networking, going through agents, and "getting a big break." You got your break, you became a public figure, then you gained fame.
But the rules have been changing, and social media and the rise of smartphone culture have substantially altered how celebrities are treated and how people gain the vast platform of fame. The old rules don't work. Starlets' breakdowns aren't concealed by publicists; they're obsessively documented by gawkers and the stars themselves on the Internet. In the 90s, President Clinton got caught in a sex scandal due to audiotapes and DNA evidence. In 2011, Congressman Anthony Weiner's  ignominious "Weinergate" embarrassment  unfolded on Twitter.
A chaotic new mode of celebrity
 But the lives of celebrities don't just fall apart on the Internet - sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram can also catapult people to levels of fame they'd otherwise never reach.
For instance, Justin Bieber is often called the first YouTube superstar, and accurately so: The teen dream got his start by posting videos, not by going through the teen idol machine (although he did that later, with Usher's help). And Bieber's devoted Beliebers are all the more ardent about their coiffed, swagged out pint-size R&B star because he's such an active Twitter user. They have a direct entrance to his attention, even if he likely misses the vast majority of the tweets he receives just due to the sheer volume.
Bieber jumped to the highest level of fame imaginable, and he's not alone. Plenty of people have used social media to carve out niches for themselves just on the strength of their tweets or photos; for instance, Megan Amram is now a well-known television writer for Parks and Recreation, but she broke into screenwriting by way of Twitter. After graduating from Harvard in 2010, she started a Twitter account that was funny enough to get over 90,000 followers, which led to paid writing jobs. She now has almost 350,000 followers.
Amram isn't the only person to launch themselves into the entertainment industry through Twitter. Kelly Oxford was a housewife in Calgary, Alberta, who started a Twitter account in 2009. Her pithy account gained attention from people like Roger Ebert and Jimmy Fallon, and now she's sold several pilots and recently authored a book (and made the move to L.A.). Without the Internet - and specifically, Twitter - she'd probably still be in Canada.

Web MD is like a Choose Your Own Adventure book where the ending is always cancer.
— kelly oxford (@kellyoxford) January 24, 2013

Read more